3
$\begingroup$

I understand that $k$ describes positive, negative, or no curvature. However, why can't there be, for example, +0.5 (semi-positive) curvature, etc?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Which values $k$ can or cannot take depends on its exact definition, as hinted at e.g. in the Wikipedia article. Please state your definition of $k$ and what exactly you don't understand about its values range. $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Apr 2 '18 at 20:59
  • $\begingroup$ I don't think this is seriously unclear. The definition of $k$ is clear from the fact that OP knows it can only be $0$ or $\pm 1$. $\endgroup$ – Javier Apr 2 '18 at 22:34
  • $\begingroup$ @Javier Okay, well, it is unclear. I asked my cosmology professor and he said, "Interesting idea, you should look into that." But, I clearly don't understand enough advanced maths to read the equation ACuriousMind linked. As stated, I understand that +1 is positive curvature. Why isn't +0.1, +0.95, etc? Not everyone on SE has masters degrees. I don't understand why I'm constantly talked down to for not understanding and braving to ask. $\endgroup$ – Rubellite Fae Apr 3 '18 at 19:28
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, I was responding to the above comment. I was saying that the question shouldn't be closed for being unclear, because it is not. It is a good question IMO. $\endgroup$ – Javier Apr 3 '18 at 19:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Javier I see. Perhaps I have gotten touchy from past experiences. I thought you meant the answer is obvious, not the question. Apologies $\endgroup$ – Rubellite Fae Apr 3 '18 at 19:48
5
$\begingroup$

The continuum of curvatures does exist, but we find it more convenient to put it elsewhere. The crucial part of the metric that encodes the curvature is a factor $1-K r^2$, where $r$ is the radial coordinate (using any point as the origin), and $K$ is any real number, positive or negative. By dimensional analysis, there is some length $L$ such that either $K=1/L^2$ or $K=-1/L^2$, so we can rewrite our formula as $1 - k (r/L)^2$, where $k$ is just the sign of $K$, or $0$ if $K=0$. The case $k=0$ corresponds to $L$ equal to infinity.

This new variable $k$ can only have the values $\pm 1$ or $0$, but that's okay because $L$ still can be any length, so we have the whole range of curvatures. $L$ is known as the radius of curvature of the universe, and a larger $L$ implies a smaller curvature. $k$ determines whether this curvature is positive or negative.

Now, and this is a bit of a technical point, we can make that $L$ go away if we measure our coordinate $r$ in units of $L$. In our formula, we can set $x = r/L$ to get just $1-kx^2$. The continuum of curvatures is still there but it is hidden inside of $x$, because the physical interpretation of $x$ depends on $L$: $x$ is how many times $L$ fits in your distance. So if for example $L = 1\ \text{light-year}$, $x=2$ is a distance of $2$ light-years, but if $L = 3$ light-years then $x=2$ is actually a distance of $6$ light-years. Mathematically, the price we pay is that $L$ now shows up elsewhere in the formulas, in the part we use to calculate lengths.

To sum up, the curvature can indeed take any value: the closer it is to zero, the closer space is to being flat. The fact that $k$ can only be $\pm 1$ or zero is just a matter of convenience: we use $k$ to label the three qualitatively different scenarios of positive/negative/zero curvature. $L$ just sets the size scale for the universe.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Great! That helped so much. So in $(ds)^2 = \frac{[R(t)]^2}{1 + \frac{kr^2}{4}} [(dx)^2 + (dy)^2 + (dz)^2] - c^2 (dt)^2$ where is our L or "x?" The r next to k ? $\endgroup$ – Rubellite Fae Apr 5 '18 at 15:28
  • $\begingroup$ @RubelliteFae $L$ is inside $R(t)$, which is $L$ times an adimensional function $a(t)$ which tells you how the universe expands over time. Also, to make LaTeX display, enclose it between dollar signs. $\endgroup$ – Javier Apr 5 '18 at 16:10
  • $\begingroup$ Aha! We learned that $R(t)$ is the scale factor, but that $R(t)=\frac{l(t)}{r}$ not $R(t)=L*a(t)$. But, you are helping me make more sense of it. I'll reread my previous chapter when I get some time. Thanks so much $\endgroup$ – Rubellite Fae Apr 5 '18 at 17:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.