I have recently read some hard science-fiction story based on an assumption that if time stops (from external observer's perspective) on the event horizon of black hole, then in an anti-matter black hole's horizon the time would pass infinitely fast (same perspective)

I thought it was impossible, but I'm not sure anymore.

What would be the effect of approaching the event horizon of an anti-matter black hole?

Is it possible that an infinity of time passes in a finite time (from our point of view) ?

Fun follow-up: if so, can a result of infinite computation be returned to our timeline?


A black hole may result from a gravitational collapse of either matter or antimatter, but the black hole itself is a geometrical object — a feature of the shape of space-time, not a material object. The behaviour of space-time at or near to a black hole is the same however it originates, so long as the bulk is electrically neutral; and a charged black behaves the same regardless of whether its charge is due to having absorbed e.g. more protons or more positrons.

Therefore, there is no real distinction between a "matter" black hole and an "antimatter" black hole; in particular, a black hole which happened to form due to the gravitational collapse of a large amount of antimatter would be indistinguishable from a black hole arising from a collapse of matter (or indeed from a sufficiently dense combination of matter and antimatter, arising from a dense nugget of matter and a dense nugget of antimatter brought together that only achieve the "critical density" as they approach each other).

  • $\begingroup$ "The behaviour of space-time at or near to a black hole is the same however it originates." This is false. For example, a black hole with electrical charge differs from an electrically neutral black hole. $\endgroup$ – Ben Crowell Oct 13 '12 at 1:22
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for clearing this for me Niel. @BenCrowell Could You elaborate (or better - give a link)? $\endgroup$ – naugtur Oct 13 '12 at 8:33
  • $\begingroup$ @BenCrowell: right, a bit too hastily written. Edited. $\endgroup$ – Niel de Beaudrap Oct 13 '12 at 9:39
  • $\begingroup$ @naugtur: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-hair_theorem $\endgroup$ – Ben Crowell Oct 14 '12 at 18:54

protected by Qmechanic Apr 8 '13 at 8:40

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.