I have the following setup:

Mass $A$ is $4m$ kg and moves at 3 m/s on a smooth table. It collides directly with another mass $B$, which is $m$kg, which moves in the opposite direction to $A$ and had speed 6 m/s immediately before the collision. After the mass $A$ is said to have changed direction and move at 2 m/s.

So I want to find the coefficient of restitution.

When I applied the conservation of momentum, I found that $B$ had a speed of 14 m/s and also changed direction.

But the problem is when I calculate the coefficient of restitution I get $\frac{14 - - 2}{3 - - 6} = \frac{16}{9}$ and this is greater than 1!

I thought the coefficient of restitution was between $0$ and $1$?

  • $\begingroup$ Since 3 speeds are given and the answer does not make sense, we can guess that the speed of B after the collision must be something other than 14 m/s. You may review your momentum equations and make sure all signs are correct. $\endgroup$ – V.F. Mar 29 '18 at 18:06
  • $\begingroup$ @V.F. The momentum equation is definitely correct, so it’s not that... $\endgroup$ – PhysicsMathsLove Mar 29 '18 at 18:28

Working in units of $p_0 = m{\rm m/s}$, I get an initial state momentum:

$$ p_A + p_B = (4)(3) - (6)(1) = 12 - 6 = +6 $$

Given that $p'_A = (4)(-2) = -8$:

$$ p'_B = +14 $$.

The initial energy, in units of $p_0^2/(2m)$, is:

$$ E = \frac{p^2_A}{4} + \frac{p^2_B}{1} = 36 + 36 = 72 $$

Likewise the final state energy is:

$$ E' = \frac{p'^2_A}{4} + \frac{p'^2_B}{1} = 16 + 196 = 212$$

So the energy definitely went up.


It appears that the conditions of this problem are faulty.

If we calculate a total kinetic energy before and after the collision, using speed 14m/s for B (found for the momentum equation), we'll find that the kinetic energy after the collision (assuming for simplicity m=1), 8+98=106, is greater than the kinetic energy before the collision, 18+18=36.

This explains by e>1.

Although it is not necessarily obvious at first glance, but we have to conclude that the speed of A after the collision cannot be -2m/s.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There are plenty of means by which a collision might liberate energy, so the conditions of the problem aren't necessary problematic. $\endgroup$ – J. Murray Mar 29 '18 at 22:49
  • $\begingroup$ Is the conservation of momentum still valid in this case though? $\endgroup$ – PhysicsMathsLove Mar 29 '18 at 22:54
  • $\begingroup$ @PhysicsMathsLove Was that question directed at me? If so, then the answer is yes. $\endgroup$ – J. Murray Mar 29 '18 at 23:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @J.Murray Sure, but then e>1 is not an issue either. $\endgroup$ – V.F. Mar 30 '18 at 2:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @V.F. Yes, I agree. I don’t see anything inherently wrong here. $\endgroup$ – J. Murray Mar 30 '18 at 2:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.