0
$\begingroup$

I had been learning tensor notation for a while and here's what's I have read:

1 Tensor had rank, denote two types covarient or contravariant.

2 $T(\__\alpha,\__\beta,\_\gamma)$ in place naming notion was $=T^{ijk}e_ie_je_k(\__\alpha,\__\beta,\_\gamma)$.

3 Quote from modern classical physics: When doing tensor calculus, coefficient $T^{ijk}$ never changes, what changed was the bases i.e. $T=T^{ijk}e_ie_je_k$ and $T_{ijk}=T(e_i,e_j,e_k)$ so $T^{ijk}$ abbreviates for $T$ in terms of $e_i,e_j,e_k$; and transformation $T_{\alpha\beta\gamma}=T^{ijk}g_{i\alpha}g_{j\beta}g_{k\gamma}$.

4 Each tensor could be written as combination of asymmetry and symmetry parts.

5 $\displaystyle A^i_j=\frac{\partial x^i}{\partial x^l}\frac{\partial x^m}{\partial x^j}A^l_m$ so $\displaystyle g_l^i=\frac{\partial x^i}{\partial x^l}$ and $\displaystyle g^m_j=\frac{\partial x^m}{\partial x^j}$.

Question 1: However, I did have the following question about the exact transformation of the metric.

Suppose I have $V^{ij}=\begin{bmatrix} x_{i1j1} & x_{i1j2} \\ x_{i2j1} & x_{i2j2} \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix} \sin(t) & \cos(t) \\ \cos(w) & \sin(w*t) \end{bmatrix}$ where $e_i=\{i,j\}$(cartesian coordinates x,y) and $e_j=\{r,\theta\}$(polar coordinates)

In example, how to calculate the transformation $g^\alpha_i$ and $g^\beta_k$ of $V^{\alpha\beta}$ where $e_\beta=\{i,j\}$(cartesian coordinates x,y) and $e_\alpha=\{r,\theta\}$(polar coordinates)?

Question 2, Suppose I had a variable(i.e. time or position) dependent unites, i.e. $e_i=\{(\exp(t)+2,0),(0,\exp(w)+2)\}$(vector pair was written in Cartesian coordinates) and $e_j=\{(t,0),(w,0) \}$ how to calculate the exact expression of $g^i_j$ and $g^j_i$ and $g^{ij}$ and $g_{ij}$? and what were they?

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

In general, it was not guaranteed that the transformation could be calculated out.

I.e. by redefine $h=\arcsin(t)$ and expand $\arcsin(t)$ to entire real axis by module. we could find $d t/d\sin(t)$. However it was not for sure that $df(t)/dg(t,x)$ could always obtain a solution. Therefore the bases transformation of arbitrary functions in general could only be solve case by case.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.