1
$\begingroup$

I want to know whether there is any interaction between masses due to gravity. To illustrate my point suppose two masses are in space. They will get attracted to each other. But is this interaction due to exchange of gravitons or there is no interaction between them but a natural movement due to curvature of space time?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The curvature exists because of the masses, just as electric field potentials exist because of charges. Define "interact" and then we can say yes or no and why. Or we could say your definition is meaningless, possibly. We'll see. $\endgroup$ – Asher Mar 16 '18 at 16:16
  • $\begingroup$ @Asher interact means exchange of particles. For example in EM theory photons are the interaction particles. $\endgroup$ – Dheeraj Verma Mar 16 '18 at 16:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Until we can detect the graviton, your question is actually unanswerable. General relativity is a good enough model for gravity until we sufficiently develop and test a working quantum gravity theory. $\endgroup$ – Asher Mar 16 '18 at 16:37
1
$\begingroup$

The word interaction does not have a precise meaning in physics, but to the extent that it does have a meaning it implies an exchange of momentum. That is, if two bodies interact then they exchange momentum with each other. This implies there is an interaction force since change of momentum (also called impulse) is the integral of force with respect to time.

In relativity we should really use four momentum since this is a covariant quantity, but whether you use four momentum or three momentum it is obvious that two massive bodies do exchange momentum with each other and therefore they do interact.

But the question of how momentum is exchanged is one of those what really happens questions that have no answer in physics. Physics is the construction of mathematical models to predict physical behaviour. Newton used the gravitational field as his mathematical model, and quantum field theorists use virtual particles as their mathematical model. Both are perfectly good models within their region of applicability, but in neither case is the model intended to be a definitive statement of what is really happening. (We could at this point make the usual warning that virtual particles do not actually exist.)

So your question has no answer. The gravitational field and exchanges of virtual gravitons are both valid descriptions of the gravitational interaction. However we should note that gravitons are so weakly interacting that we are unlikely ever to detect a (real) graviton. We expect quantum gravity effects to become detectable only at energy densities far beyond what we can achieve in the laboratory.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Well, currently exchange of virtual gravitons is not a valid description, since the theory doesnt work (yet). $\endgroup$ – lalala Mar 16 '18 at 18:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.