10
$\begingroup$

My problem is to take the $d$-dimensional Ising Hamiltonian, $$H = -\sum_{i,j}\sigma_i J_{i,j} \sigma_j - \sum_{i} \tilde{h}_i \sigma_i$$ where $J_{ij}$ is a matrix describing the couplings between sites $i$ and $j$. Applying a Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation, rewrite the partition function as $$Z = N_0 \int d^N \psi \exp\left\{-\left[\frac{1}{4}\sum_{i,j} \psi_i K_{ij} \psi_j - \sum_{i} \ln[\cosh(h_i+\psi_i)]\right]\right\}$$ where $N_0$ is an overall normalization constant, $K_{ij} = (\beta J_{ij})^{-1}$, and $h_i = \beta\tilde{h}_i$. This much is relatively straightforward. We write the field as $\psi_i = \phi_i - h_i$, and we can show that $\left<\phi_i\right> \propto J_{ij} \left<\sigma_j\right>$, i.e. it can be interpreted as a "mean field" at site $i$ due to the interaction with all other sites.

Next we assume that the variation in the field is small, $\left|\phi_i\right|<<1$, we set $h_i = 0$, and expand $\ln \cosh(x) \approx \frac{1}{2}x^2 - \frac{1}{12}x^4$ to get $$Z \approx N_0\int d^N\psi \exp\left\{-\left[\frac{1}{4}\sum_{i,j}\phi_i K_{ij} \phi_j - \sum_i \left[\frac{\phi_i^2}{2} - \frac{\phi_i^4}{12}\right]\right]\right\}$$

Now we take the continuum limit, in units where the lattice spacing is unity, labeling each site by its position $\mathbf{r}$, which gives $$Z\rightarrow \mathcal{N} \int \mathcal{D}\phi\, \exp\left\{-\frac{1}{2}\left[\frac{1}{2}\int d\mathbf{r}\,d\mathbf{r}'\,\phi(\mathbf{r}) K(\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}') \phi(\mathbf{r}') - \int d\mathbf{r}\,\left[\phi(\mathbf{r})^2 - \frac{\phi(\mathbf{r})^4}{6}\right]\right]\right\}$$

This is where I am not sure how to proceed. I am told to expand $\phi(\mathbf{r}')$ as a small variation from the value at $\mathbf{r}$, i.e. $$\phi(\mathbf{r}') \approx \phi(\mathbf{r}) + (x_\mu'-x_\mu)\partial_\mu \phi(\mathbf{r}) + \frac{1}{2}(x_\mu' - x_\mu)(x_{\nu}'-x_\nu)\partial_\mu \partial_\nu \phi(\mathbf{r}) + \cdots$$ and introduce the Fourier transform $\tilde{K}(\mathbf{q}) = \int d\mathbf{r} K(\mathbf{r}) e^{-i\mathbf{q}\cdot\mathbf{r}}$ and write the continuum action as $$S = \int d^d\mathbf{r} \left[c_1 \left(\partial \phi\right)^2 + c_2 \phi^2 + c_4 \phi^4\right]$$ and find the coefficients in terms of $\tilde{K}(0)$ and $\tilde{K}''(0)$.

I believe that I can argue that $K$ is only a function of $\left|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'\right|$, in which case $K(\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}')(x_\mu'-x_\mu)$ is odd about the point $\mathbf{r}$, and so integrating over $d\mathbf{r}'$ (treating $\mathbf{r}$ as constant) will kill any term except those which depend on the square of the difference, leaving me with $$\int d\mathbf{r}\,d\mathbf{r}'\,\phi(\mathbf{r}) K(\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}') \phi(\mathbf{r}') = \int d\mathbf{r}\,d\mathbf{r}' K(\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}')\left(\phi(\mathbf{r})^2 + \frac{1}{2}(x_\mu'-x_\mu)^2\phi(\mathbf{r})\partial_\mu^2 \phi(\mathbf{r})\right) $$

The first term I can deal with, but it's the second term that I don't know how to deal with.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ In general $K_{ij}$ is the adjiacency matrix of the nearest neighbor graph. The difference between your variables $x’-x=a$ is the lattice constant. Hence that term gives rise to the “kinetic” term of the field theory $\endgroup$ – lcv Mar 14 '18 at 8:46
  • $\begingroup$ I am not sure that I can simply say that $(x_\mu' - x_\mu)$ is the lattice constant (which I have set to 1), for the purposes of the integration. I am assuming that somehow I will be able to convert $\int d\mathbf{r}' K(\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}') (x_\mu'-x_\mu)^2 \sim\tilde{K}''(\mathbf{0})$, and integrating by parts I can move one of the $\partial_\mu$ onto the other $\phi(\mathbf{r})$ to get a $(\partial_\mu\phi)^2$ term. I'm just not sure how to do it. $\endgroup$ – Kai Mar 14 '18 at 18:22
  • $\begingroup$ What I've included above is the way the problem was presented to me, I think that it would be better to leave the lattice spacing in explicitly and take the limit that $a\rightarrow 0$, since this is supposed to be a "coarse grained" mean field theory $\endgroup$ – Kai Mar 14 '18 at 18:26
  • $\begingroup$ I'm late to the party, but if the variation in the field is small you can just drop all higher derivatives, which kills the second term. $\endgroup$ – Michael Paris Mar 15 '18 at 17:29
2
$\begingroup$

You can write the (scaled) interaction part of the action as: $$S_I \equiv \int_{\mathbb R^d}d^d \mathbf r \ \phi(\mathbf r)\int_{\mathbb R^d}d^d \mathbf r' \ K(\mathbf r-\mathbf r') \ \phi(\mathbf r')$$ Let's take the inner integral over $\mathbf r'$ first (I will call it $\mathcal I$ to make things easier). Expanding $\phi(\mathbf r')$ around $\mathbf r$ gives : $$\mathcal I \equiv\int_{\mathbb R^d}d^d \mathbf r' \ K(\mathbf r-\mathbf r') \ \phi(\mathbf r') \approx \int_{\mathbb R^d}d^d \mathbf r' \ K(\mathbf r-\mathbf r') \ \bigg(\phi(\mathbf r)+ \sum_{i=1}^d (x_i'-x_i)\partial_i \phi(\mathbf r) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ +\frac 12\sum_{i=1}^d\sum_{j=1}^d (x_i'-x_i)(x_j'-x_j)\partial_i \partial_j \phi(\mathbf r) \bigg)$$ Now take the integral inside to get: $$\mathcal I\approx \phi(\mathbf r) \int_{\mathbb R^d}d^d \mathbf r' \ K(\mathbf r-\mathbf r') \ + \sum_{i=1}^d \partial_i \phi(\mathbf r)\int_{\mathbb R^d}d^d \mathbf r' \ (x_i'-x_i) K(\mathbf r-\mathbf r') +\frac 12\sum_{i=1}^d\sum_{j=1}^d \partial_i \partial_j \phi(\mathbf r) \times\int_{\mathbb R^d}d^d \mathbf r'(x_i'-x_i)(x_j'-x_j)K(\mathbf r-\mathbf r') \bigg)$$ Now assuming that the coupling is homogenous, $K(\mathbf r-\mathbf r')\equiv K(\mathbf r'-\mathbf r)$. With that in mind, and also changing variables $\mathbf R \equiv \mathbf r'-\mathbf r$, we get:

$$\mathcal I \approx \phi(\mathbf r) \int_{\mathbb R^d}d^d \mathbf R \ K(\mathbf R) \ + \sum_{i=1}^d \partial_i \phi(\mathbf r)\int_{\mathbb R^d}d^d \mathbf R \ R_i K(\mathbf R) +\frac 12\sum_{i=1}^d\sum_{j=1}^d \partial_i \partial_j \phi(\mathbf r) \ \ \ \ \times\int_{\mathbb R^d}d^d \mathbf R \ R_iR_jK(\mathbf R) \bigg)$$ You can relate each of the integrals over $\mathbf R$ to the Fourier transform of $K(\mathbf R)$ defined as $\tilde K(\mathbf q) \equiv \int_{\mathbb R^d} d^d \mathbf R \ K(\mathbf R)\exp(-i \mathbf{q} . \mathbf R)$:

- First integral: $$\int_{\mathbb R^d}d^d \mathbf R \ K(\mathbf R) = \int_{\mathbb R^d}d^d \mathbf R \ K(\mathbf R) \ e^{-i \mathbf q. \mathbf R} |_{\mathbf q =0} = \tilde K(\mathbf 0)$$ - Second integral: $$\int_{\mathbb R^d}d^d \mathbf R \ R_i K(\mathbf R) =0$$ Because of the integrand being odd as you mentioned.

- Third integral:
For this one we first note that as you mentioned the integral is zero for all different $i,j$. For $i=j$, first note that: $$\frac{\partial^2}{\partial q_i^2} \int_{\mathbb R^d}d^d \mathbf R \ K(\mathbf R) \ e^{-i \mathbf q. \mathbf R} = \int_{\mathbb R^d}d^d \mathbf R \ (-i)(-i) R_i R_i K(\mathbf R) \ e^{-i \mathbf q. \mathbf R} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ = - \int_{\mathbb R^d}d^d \mathbf R \ R_i^2 K(\mathbf R) \ e^{-i \mathbf q. \mathbf R} $$ Which implies: $$\int_{\mathbb R^d}d^d \mathbf R \ R_i^2 K(\mathbf R)=-\frac{\partial^2}{\partial q_i^2} \int_{\mathbb R^d}d^d \mathbf R \ K(\mathbf R) \ e^{-i \mathbf q. \mathbf R}|_{\mathbf q=0}=-\frac{\partial^2}{\partial q_i^2}\tilde K(\mathbf q) |_{\mathbf q=0} $$ Now if you assume that the coupling is also isotropic, i.e. $\exists \mathcal K : K(\mathbf R) \equiv \mathcal K(|\mathbf R|)$, the Fourier transform of $K$ will become a single variable function, meaning that the third integral is just $-\tilde K''(0)$.

In summary, $\mathcal I$ is: $$\mathcal I \approx \phi(\mathbf r) \tilde K(0) \ - \frac 12\sum_{i=1}^d \partial_i^2 \phi(\mathbf r) \tilde K''(0)$$ Thus, the interaction term in the action is: $$S_I = \int_{\mathbb R^d}d^d \mathbf r \ \phi(\mathbf r) \mathcal I = \int_{\mathbb R^d}d^d \mathbf r \ \phi(\mathbf r)\bigg(\phi(\mathbf r) \tilde K(0) \ - \frac 12\sum_{i=1}^d\partial_i^2 \phi(\mathbf r) \tilde K''(0)\bigg)$$

$$=\tilde K(0)\int_{\mathbb R^d}d^d \mathbf r \ \phi^2(\mathbf r) - \frac {\tilde K''(0)}2\sum_{i=1}^d \int_{\mathbb R^d}d^d \mathbf r \ \phi(\mathbf r) \ \partial_i^2 \phi(\mathbf r) $$ Integrating by parts in the second term results in (boundary terms vanish because $\phi(\mathbf r) \to 0$ as $|\mathbf r| \to \infty$ so that the integrals converge): $$S_I =\tilde K(0)\int_{\mathbb R^d}d^d \mathbf r \ \phi^2(\mathbf r) + \frac {\tilde K''(0)}2\sum_{i=1}^d\int_{\mathbb R^d}d^d \mathbf r \ \partial_i \phi(\mathbf r) \ \partial_i \phi(\mathbf r)$$ $$=\tilde K(0)\int_{\mathbb R^d}d^d \mathbf r \ \phi^2(\mathbf r) + \frac {\tilde K''(0)}2 \int_{\mathbb R^d}d^d \mathbf r \ \sum_{i=1}^d (\partial_i \phi(\mathbf r))^2$$

$$=\int_{\mathbb R^d}d^d \mathbf r \ \bigg( \tilde K(0) \phi^2(\mathbf r) + \frac {\tilde K''(0)}2 \ \big( \partial \phi(\mathbf r) \big)^2 \bigg)$$ Plugging this in the full action finally gives: $$S[\phi] =\int_{\mathbb R^d}d^d \mathbf r \ \bigg( \frac {\tilde K''(0)}8 \ \big( \partial \phi(\mathbf r) \big)^2 + \left(\frac {\tilde K(0)}{4}- \frac 12\right) \phi^2(\mathbf r) + \frac 1{12} \phi^4(\mathbf r) \bigg) $$ Notice that the coefficient of the quadratic term can change sign with temperature (through $\tilde K$), which is a sign of a phase transition.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks so much! I was able to get the quadratic term correct and I did note that since $\tilde{K} \propto \beta^{-1}$ that at low temperature the sign will change and there will be a phase transition, I just wasn't able to get the first term. I have not gone through all of your solution yet but thank you. $\endgroup$ – Kai Mar 14 '18 at 23:13
  • $\begingroup$ You're more than welcome! $\endgroup$ – Sahand Tabatabaei Mar 14 '18 at 23:17
  • $\begingroup$ I had been trying to do something similar to what you did for the third integral but I was inserting the inverse transform first, after which I couldn't figure out how to apply the derivatives, since I had both $K$ and the phase factor depending on $\mathbf{q}$. I hadn't thought of it this way. Thank you again this has been quite instructive and helpful. $\endgroup$ – Kai Mar 14 '18 at 23:19
  • $\begingroup$ I'm happy I could help. $\endgroup$ – Sahand Tabatabaei Mar 14 '18 at 23:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I was just looking over this again, I believe you meant to say that the boundary term vanishes because $\phi(\mathbf r)\to 0$ as $|\mathbf r| \to \infty$. $\endgroup$ – Kai Mar 15 '18 at 2:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.