1
$\begingroup$

Consider a ray of light travelling between two points A and B on the $xy$ plane. Using the calculus of variations and Fermat's Principle we can derive equations which give the trajectory of a ray of light through a medium of given refractive index $n(y)$ by minimising,
\begin{equation} T = \int n(y) \sqrt{1+{\Big(\frac{dy}{dx}\Big)}^2}dx \end{equation} and using the Euler-Lagrange equations we arrive quickly at an integral expression for the trajectory as \begin{equation} x = \int \frac{\alpha\> dy}{\sqrt{{n(y)^2-\alpha}^2}} \end{equation} with $\alpha$ as some arbitrary constant based on initial conditions. Now consider the refractive index of the medium to be $\> n(y)= n_0 \cos(ky)$.

At this point I can't seem to progress; Is this integral solvable with this continuously varying index? Is this the correct approach or is there a more convenient way to find the trajectory?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

The integral you're trying to solve is $$ x = \int \frac{\beta}{\sqrt{\cos^2 (ky) - \beta^2}} dy = \int \frac{\beta}{\sqrt{(1 - \beta^2) - \sin^2 (ky)}} dy \\= \frac{\beta}{\sqrt{1 - \beta^2}} \int \frac{dy}{\sqrt{1 - \sin^2 (ky)/(1 - \beta^2)}} dy, $$ where $\beta \equiv \alpha/n_0$. This can be recognized to be an incomplete elliptic integral of the first kind: $$ x - x_0 = F \left( ky \left| \frac{1}{1 - \beta^2}\right) \right. $$ where $x_0$ is the $x$-coordinate when $y = 0$. If desired, this can be inverted to find $y(x)$ in terms of the Jacobi elliptic functions: $$ y = \frac{1}{k} \sin^{-1} (\mathrm{sn} (x - x_0)). $$ In this notation, the use of the parameter $1/(1- \beta^2)$ in the definition of the inverse function is understood.

In some sense, I haven't really told you how to evaluate this integral; I've just told you that this integral has a name and has been studied (along with its inverse function.) The problem of plotting $y(x)$ (or $x(y)$) and understanding where the trajectories go is still there; and unless you have a completely intuitive understanding of the elliptic functions (I don't), then this is probably unilluminating. Still, it might give you somewhere to go from here; most mathematical handbooks can tell you about the analytical properties of the elliptic integrals and the Jacobi elliptic functions, and a computer language that can do upper-level math (e.g., Mathematica, Maple, MATLAB, etc.) could plot the trajectories out for you.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Indeed. The correct response to getting an elliptic integral is (a very specific flavour of) giving up. Much like getting, say, a Bessel integral, you just reshape it into the canonical form and then that's the end of the line. $\endgroup$ – Emilio Pisanty Feb 6 at 21:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.