I know that generally the uncertainty in the mean of a sample should be equal to:

$\frac{V_{max} - V_{min}}{2} $

where $V_{max}$ is the maximum value and $V_{min}$ the minimum value of the sample of data. However, what if each value has its own uncertainty? For example, I have to values:

$R1 = 12.8 \pm 0.2$ m

$R2 = 13.6 \pm 0.4$ m

The mean would be $13.2$ m, but what about the uncertainty? Will be it be the range $1.4/2$ or will it be the combined uncertainty of each measurment?


If you have two uncorrelated quantities $x$ and $y$ with uncertainties $\delta x$ and $\delta y$, then their sum $z=x+y$ has uncertainty

$$\delta z = \sqrt{(\delta x)^2 + (\delta y)^2}$$

The average would then have uncertainty $$\frac{\delta z}{2} = \frac{\sqrt{(\delta x)^2 + (\delta y)^2}}{2}$$

Intuitively, one might imagine that

$$\delta z = \delta x + \delta y$$

However, this overestimates the uncertainty in $z$. If $x$ and $y$ are uncorrelated, then it is very unlikely that their errors would constructively add in this way. It is of course possible that $x$ and $y$ are correlated, but then more complicated analysis is required.

  • $\begingroup$ Could you provide a reason (or a reference to a reputable source) to why that is the case? $\endgroup$ – daljit97 Mar 13 '18 at 20:29
  • $\begingroup$ The reason is that measured quantities are typically assumed to correspond to normally distributed random variables, and the uncertainty is the standard deviation. Adding two such random variables results in a random variable with standard deviation given by the above formula. This can be found in essentially any reference on experimental techniques, such as this one. $\endgroup$ – J. Murray Mar 13 '18 at 21:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.