2
$\begingroup$

As far as I've understood, quantum decoherence is the "loss" of quantum coherence.

To a person who knows almost nothing about quantum mechanics, who studied physics only at high school and who is more or less mathematically educated (i.e. knows the basics of linear algebra, calculus, etc), how would you explain what quantum coherence and decoherence is? In which sense quantum decoherence is the "loss" of quantum coherence?

Why are these two concepts so important in quantum mechanics, computation, and information? It may also be helpful to mention concrete examples of situations where these concepts come into play in these three fields.

If I understood correctly, quantum decoherence is a "problem" which quantum computer engineers must solve in order to be able to build a quantum computer. Why exactly is that?

I am more interested in intuitive explanations, rather than formulas, which are welcome if they may help to convey the meaning of concepts.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Quantum coherence is the coexistence (in a rather badly defined sense of "existence") of several non-exclusive quasi-classical descriptions of a physical system, which are all "existing" together in such a way that they produce interference effects. This makes the system behave, well, non-classically.

I don't know if the previous sentence is intuitive enough, this is after all a very technical question. Several of the words I used have a problematic or non-trivial meaning. Let me explain.

The point is that in the classical world (to be short, this is the world as seen by physics before QM, let's say the 19th century world), a physical system is a set of actual objects that have definite properties like positions and momenta. These properties have well defined values at all time, whether they manifest themselves in a measurable way or not.

In QM, it seems that when such properties are not involved in a too "intense" (again, not a well-defined concept here) interaction with the rest of the world, when they do not manifest themselves in a measurable way, we just cannot assume that they have definite values at all.

Instead, the different values a property can take kind of coexist as long as the property is not measured. This coexistence is a non-trivial mathematical relationship that allows phasing and dephasing, like in wave mechanics (hence the wave-particle duality idea). Moreover, there is still consistence in the way properties are linked together: the system (which ultimately is nothing else that the ensemble of all properties needed to describe it) does not loose its structure. But it seems that this structure is much more free to "explore" its potentialities of evolution.

This is where coherence is important for quantum computing. It is precisely because the system behaves as many different systems interfering all together that its description is in some sense similar to a parallel computation.

Decoherence can be seen as the manifestation of the rest of the world: not being isolated anymore, the quantum system loose its weird freedom, and behave like a proper disciplined classical one. No more quantum computing.

So in which sense is decoherence the "loss" of coherence? Formally, in the sense that interfering terms in the description of the system as a superposition of states vanish. What this means intuitively and physically, though, is not clear at all (that's the "measurement problem") and it is at this point that QM interpretations enter the dance. In what I wrote above I tried to give an intuitive view as free as possible from such interpretations, but I guess some of my personal views have leaked in. So take this all with a grain of salt.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ In the way you defined it, quantum coherence seems to be a term to simply describe the fact that a physical system may be described as a superposition (linear combination?) of states. Is this correct? $\endgroup$ – nbro Mar 10 '18 at 21:17
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, see for example Coherence Time: Survival of a Quantum State where coherent state and superposition are basically synonyms. But then, they also use "quantum state" for superposition; that's because what you put as ingredients in a superposition is in a certain sense arbitrary, so all quantums states are superpositions. When speaking of coherence, we mean that interference effects are expected. $\endgroup$ – Stéphane Rollandin Mar 10 '18 at 23:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.