0
$\begingroup$

My query pertains to the following exercise:

enter image description here

The way I understand the physics of this situation is the following:

  • We must first follow the principle of superposition for waves. When the two waves interfere, we can find the resulting displacement by adding them.

$$\implies s(t) = sin(2\pi ft) + sin(2\pi ft + \pi)$$

The path difference is the difference of each megaphone's respective distance.. by definition, I would think.

This would be, by Pythagoras, roughly $0.4\ m$.

The equation I've been taught to consider includes path difference and looks like it should be used in some way:

$$s(x_P,t) = 2Acos\left(\frac{\Delta \phi}{2}\right)cos(kx_{av}-\omega t + \phi_{0,av})$$

But this was derived from a different setup with this, where the speakers where both co-linear to the point we want to consider the displacement at.

Anyway, the problem I run in with this logic is this.

For what I currently have, I use the $sin \ \alpha + sin \ \beta $ identity and expressed $2\pi f$ as $\omega$.

$$s(t)= 2sin(\frac{\omega t + \omega t + \pi}{2})cos(\frac{\omega t - \omega t + \pi}{2})$$ $$ s(t)= 2sin(\frac{2\omega t + \pi}{2})cos(\pi /2)$$

Which... goes to $0$ for all $t$. I clearly messed something up here. Not only have I not been able to incorporate path difference, but I generally botched this.

Does anyone have the right sense for this?


Edit

I've reattempted the problem again, and came up with an answer anyway. I've only got one value of $f$, rather than selecting a lowest possible one, so I'm not sure if it makes sense, but the answer seems reasonable.

The top speaker is separated from Point $X$ by $\sqrt{16+400}$ meters.

$$\implies x_1 = 4\sqrt{26} \ m$$ $$x_2 = 20 \ m$$

The phase difference is due to a spacial path difference. The phase difference is given as $\pi$.

$$\implies \Delta \phi = k\Delta x$$ $$\pi = k(x_1-x_2)$$ $$\implies k = 7.93 \ m^{-1}$$ $$\implies \lambda = 0.792 \ m $$ $$\implies f = 428.75 \ Hz$$

Does this reasoning make sense?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ You do not need all those trig formulas to handle $\pi$. $\endgroup$ – Pieter Mar 7 '18 at 7:48
1
$\begingroup$

I clearly messed something up here.

Perhaps you have relied too much on equations and neglected the Physics?

Your conclusion that $ s(t) = \sin(2\pi ft) + \sin(2\pi ft + \pi)=0$ is quite correct because it states that at a given position for all time when the phase difference between the two superposing waves is $\pi$ the resultant amplitude is zero - destructive interference.

Not only have I not been able to incorporate path difference, but I generally botched this.

Not true.
When you added the $\pi$ in your equation you have incorporated the information about the path difference.
If the two sources emit waves which are in phase you have said that when those waves arrive at the position that you are considering the waves are now $\pi$ out of phase because the waves from each of the sources have travkleed different distances.
You should now be able to equate that difference in phase to a difference in path length in terms of the wavelength of the waves.


In terms of the wave equations you are considering the following addition

$$\sin(\omega t - kr) + \sin(wt-k(r+a)) = 2 \cos \left( \frac{ka}{2}\right)\sin\left( \omega t-kr - \frac {ka}{2}\right) $$

where $k=\frac{2\pi}{\lambda},\, \omega = 2\pi f,\,r $ is the distance between one source and the position under consideration and $a$ is the extra distance travelled by the waves from the other source.

Note the similarity between the equation above and the equation that you used $ s(t)= 2\sin\left (\dfrac{2\omega t + \pi}{2}\right )\cos(\dfrac{\pi}{2})$.

The sine term is a travelling wave with a phase shift of $-\frac {ka}{2}$ and the cosine term modulates the amplitude of the resultant wave between $2$ (constructive interference) and $0$ (destructive interference).

In the question you are being asked to make the cosine term zero and relate the path difference, $a$, to the geometry of the arrangement of sources that you are considering.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I've attempted this question again, please do let me know if I'm making a bit more sense this time! $\endgroup$ – sangstar Mar 8 '18 at 13:12
  • $\begingroup$ I think that you now have the right idea. $\endgroup$ – Farcher Mar 8 '18 at 14:19
  • $\begingroup$ Cool! Why do I have no "lowest possible value" to choose from? $\endgroup$ – sangstar Mar 9 '18 at 5:41
  • $\begingroup$ @sangstar If the frequency is lower then the wavelength is higher. Could you fit half wavelength into the path difference if the wavelength is larger ie the frequency was lower? $\endgroup$ – Farcher Mar 9 '18 at 9:36
  • $\begingroup$ I'm confused by what you mean, I'm afraid. Could I fit half of a wavelength larger than my current value into the path difference equation? $\endgroup$ – sangstar Mar 9 '18 at 11:39
0
$\begingroup$

I don't think you need all the sines and cosines, rather, just count distance using phase mod $2\pi$--the natural unit being $\lambda$ mod $1$. Of course, you have to include the electronic phase difference $\pi$ being $\lambda/2$:

$$ X - \frac{\lambda}2 = \sqrt{X^2+(4m)^2}$$

Solving for the smallest $\lambda$ gives you $f$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.