1
$\begingroup$

I'm new here. Given the Lagrangian,

$ L=\frac{1}{2}∂_{μ}\Phi (∂^{μ}\Phi)^{*} − \frac{λ}{4}(\Phi\Phi^{*} - 1)^{2}$

and its energy-momentum tensor

$T^{\mu}_{\nu}=\frac{\partial L}{\partial(\partial^{\mu}\Phi^{*})}\partial_{\nu} \Phi -δ^{μ}_{ν}L $

For the element $T^{0}_{0}$ I get

$T^{0}_{0}=\frac{1}{2}\dot{\Phi}^{2}+\frac{1}{2}(\nabla{\Phi})^{2}+\frac{λ}{4}(\Phi\Phi^{*} - 1)^{2}$

Which seems to be incorrect, could anyone help me find the correct answer? Thank you for your time!!

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The correct formula for the energy momentum tensor is $T^\mu{}_\nu = \frac{ \partial L }{ \partial ( \partial^\mu \Phi ) } \partial_\nu \Phi + \frac{ \partial L }{ \partial ( \partial^\mu \Phi^* ) } \partial_\nu \Phi^* - \delta^\mu_\nu L$. Also, for canonically normalized fields, your Lagrangian should be $L = \partial_\mu \Phi ( \partial^\mu \Phi )^* - \frac{\lambda}{4} ( \Phi \Phi^* - 1 )^2$. $\endgroup$ – Prahar Mar 5 '18 at 23:21
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much @Prahar !! I'm new to field theory so I have still some questions, I get the expression $\frac{\partial(\partial_{μ} \Phi(\partial^{μ} \Phi)^{*})}{\partial(\partial^{μ}\Phi)}\partial_{ν} \Phi$ what does this differentiation equal to? $\endgroup$ – Cool Cookie Mar 5 '18 at 23:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It is $(\partial_\mu \Phi)^* \partial_\nu \Phi$. $\endgroup$ – Prahar Mar 6 '18 at 0:02
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. There is! I made a mistake in my earlier formula. The correct index structure is $T_{\mu\nu} = \frac{ \partial L }{ \partial ( \partial^\mu \Phi )} \partial_\nu \Phi + \frac{ \partial L }{ \partial ( \partial^\nu \Phi^* )} \partial_\mu \Phi^* - \eta_{\mu\nu} L$. To obtain $T^\mu_\nu$ you can now just raise the $\mu$ index. $\endgroup$ – Prahar Mar 6 '18 at 0:43
  • $\begingroup$ First of all, what you have written is not true. What is true is $\frac{ \partial ( \partial_\mu \Phi (\partial^\mu \Phi)^* )}{ \partial (\partial^\mu \Phi ) } \partial_\nu \Phi = \partial_\mu \Phi^* \partial_\nu \Phi$. Next, since $\eta^{\mu\nu}$ does not depend on the field $\Phi$ there is no problem with perform any contraction with it. $\endgroup$ – Prahar Mar 6 '18 at 3:01
0
$\begingroup$

The correct canonical normalized Lagrangian should be $$ L = ( \partial^\mu \Phi)^*( \partial_\mu \Phi ) - \frac{\lambda}{4} ( \Phi^* \Phi - 1 )^4 \,. $$ The canonical energy momentum tensor is $$ T^\mu{}_\nu = \frac{\partial L }{ \partial( \partial_\mu \Phi ) } \partial_\nu \Phi + \frac{\partial L }{ \partial( (\partial_\mu \Phi)^* ) } (\partial_\nu \Phi)^* - \delta^\mu_\nu L . $$ Applying this to the Lagrangian at hand, we find $$ T^\mu{}_\nu = (\partial^\mu \Phi)^* \partial_\nu \Phi + \partial^\mu \Phi ( \partial_\nu \Phi )^* - \delta^\mu_\nu \left[ ( \partial^\alpha \Phi)^*( \partial_\alpha \Phi ) - \frac{\lambda}{4} ( \Phi^* \Phi - 1 )^4 \right] $$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I can't begin to thank you enough!!! Have a great day!! $\endgroup$ – Cool Cookie Mar 6 '18 at 3:27
1
$\begingroup$

You aren't applying the energy-momentum tensor in the right way. You should sum over both fields. Check again your formula!

Edit: You have to consider the complex field like an other field.

Edit2: The correct formula is given by $$T^\mu_{\nu} = \frac{\partial L}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi_a)}\partial_\nu \phi_a - \delta_\nu^\mu L $$ where you have to sum over all fiels $\phi_a = \{\Phi, \Phi^*\}$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Would you mind writing down the right expression? I'm having trouble understanding what you are saying. $\endgroup$ – Cool Cookie Mar 5 '18 at 23:12
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry to bother you but could you write the correct expression for the energy-momentum tensor regarding 2 fields then? $\endgroup$ – Cool Cookie Mar 5 '18 at 23:18
  • $\begingroup$ Ok done, I edited my post. I hope it is clear now. $\endgroup$ – boroboro Mar 5 '18 at 23:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.