In my book it is written that

$$\text{refractive index} = c/v =\sqrt{\text{permeability} \times \text{permittivity}}$$

The dielectric constant medium is dependent on the frequency of the field. For example for dc fields, the dielectric constant of water is 80.4 while in the frequency range of visible light it is 1.8 only. It is because in highly oscillating fields the dipoles fail to orient with the oscillating field.

According to this refractive index should increase with increasing wavelength

But also

$$\text{refractive index} = a + b/\mathrm{wavelength}^2,$$

which decreases with increases wavelength. How is this possible?

  • $\begingroup$ What is a and b? $\endgroup$ – LLlAMnYP Mar 3 '18 at 9:13
  • $\begingroup$ @LLlAMnYP they are constants $\endgroup$ – Vishal Singh Mar 3 '18 at 9:30
  • $\begingroup$ Well, I'm not sure if I know of any such equation. Maybe it's wrong? $\endgroup$ – LLlAMnYP Mar 3 '18 at 9:32
  • $\begingroup$ @LLlAMnYP it is correct. In dispersion of light you will find this equation. Which tells us that blue color diffracts the most and red the least... $\endgroup$ – Vishal Singh Mar 3 '18 at 9:39
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Depending on the material, it's perfectly possible for the refractive index to both increase or decrease with wavelength; those conditions are respectively known as anomalous and normal dispersion. $\endgroup$ – Emilio Pisanty Mar 3 '18 at 17:14

$a + b / \lambda^2$ is just an approximation. It’s typically used in a limited range, e.g. across visible light frequencies.

The approximation breaks down outside that range: X-rays don’t refract strongly in glass.

Physically, the $1/\lambda^2$ term, perhaps better seen as an $\omega^2$ term, is due to the dipoles “falling behind” the incident wave. At higher frequencies, that lag matters more. At high enough frequencies, the dipoles start to behave in other ways, and the approximation breaks down.

More formally, the response of a material has poles and zeros, and this is an approximation to how you approach one.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Analytic and as well empiric equation $n(\lambda)$ are both material dependant. It is called dispersion relation.

For BK7 glass this seems quadratic with a positive coefficient $b$. See best resource refractiveindex.info including dispersion equation $n^2(\lambda)$ in polynominal approximation. BK7 like quadratic formula

Depicted is BK7 of Hoya: $n^2(\lambda)\approx 2.27+ 0.0116\cdot\lambda^{-2}- 0.0092\cdot\lambda^{2}$

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.