2
$\begingroup$

In 't Hooft's original paper: http://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/phys/2005-0622-152933/14055.pdf

he takes $N \rightarrow \infty $ while $ g^2 N$ is held fixed. Is this just a toy model? Or is there some reason to believe that $g^2$ goes like $\frac{1}{N}$ for large coupling? Thanks a lot.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

The parameters $g^2$ and $N$ are independent of each other so it is meaningless to ask whether $g^2$ goes like $1/N$ for large or small coupling "in general". In general, it may go but it doesn't have to go.

But if it does go, i.e. if $g^2 N$ is kept fixed, then one may say new interesting things. If one introduces a new symbol $\lambda = g^2 N$ for the 't Hooft coupling, the condition simply says that $\lambda$ is kept fixed – which is natural, especially in the dual stringy interpretation of the same physics.

I need to dedicate a special paragraph to an error in your question which is probably not just a typo, due to the complicated work you had to go through to write the fractions. What is kept fixed in 't Hooft's limit isn't $g^2/N$; it is $g^2 N$. It's the product, not the ratio! So $g^2$ indeed goes like $1/N$ and not $N$ if $N$ is sent to infinity.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.