0
$\begingroup$

We use them every day and those in the know fully understand the functional characteristics of BJT transistors. There are documents and links galore explaining the operational math. There are even tons of nice videos that explain current theories of how they physically work. ( Most of the latter given by folks that speak "Tele-marketer English" for some reason. )

However, I have to admit, even after 40+ years, a lot of it I have to accept at face value, since the descriptions of how the collector junction fits into the equation is always a bit hand-wavy.

Anyhow, that aside, there is one facet I really just don't get. It seems to defy the laws of physics, Kirchhoff's Laws et.al.

I'm talking about your standard saturated common emitter circuit.

It is known, and we accept, that when saturated, the collector voltage will be less than the base voltage. We obviously use that to our advantage in circuits and chose parts to give us as low a Vce-Sat as possible for a particular load current.

All fine and dandy, till you look at the quintessential mode of a typical NPN transistor...

enter image description here

How the heck can the collector be a lower voltage than the base in that sandwich?

Even if you add in some back-EMF type voltage in there to account for it, the collector current would be going the wrong way through the base-collector junction..

$\endgroup$

marked as duplicate by Qmechanic Feb 19 '18 at 12:53

This question was marked as an exact duplicate of an existing question.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Qmechanic - I would not see that so. The Nobel Price for Physics was awarded for the discovery of the bipolar transistor. Any physicist should know how a bipolar transistor works. At least the basics of it. Thus this is definitely a physics question. I voted to reopen it. $\endgroup$ – freecharly Feb 17 '18 at 3:11
  • $\begingroup$ Crossposted from electronics.stackexchange.com/q/356597/52589 Please don't make simultaneous crossposts. $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Feb 17 '18 at 3:21
  • $\begingroup$ Related meta post: physics.meta.stackexchange.com/q/10472/2451 $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Feb 17 '18 at 16:48
  • $\begingroup$ Hi Trevor_G. Please don't repost a closed question in a new entry. Instead, you are supposed to edit the original question within the original entry. $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Feb 17 '18 at 16:54
  • $\begingroup$ @Qmechanic thanks.. I wasn't sure.. since it was migrated I deleted it from EE.. then I didn't realize it was still here nor know what to do with it.. $\endgroup$ – Trevor_G Feb 19 '18 at 13:45