2
$\begingroup$

  1. Speaker power consumption quadruples when producing sound with double amplitude.

  2. Two speakers consume two times the energy of single speaker.

  3. Two speakers playing signal in phase double the sound amplitude.

If all these statements are correct,it means two speakers will produce same sound amplitude as single speaker with half the power consumption.That seems impossible becose if single speaker had more than 50% efficiency,it will create more energy than it consumes thus violating laws about conservation of energy.

Maybe it have to do with fact that double velocity is quadruple energy and sound a amplitude is related to volume of displaced air so two speakers can move same amount of air,but with half the particle velocity so the total energy is half ( 1/4 for single speaker,half total for two )

What are your thought? Is it really possible that two speakers need half the power to produce same sound amplitude? Is there something that I am missing that would prevent violating the laws of energy?

|cite|improve this question
$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Assume in all that follows each speaker arrangement treated here is properly impedance-matched to the power source driving it. This is essential to properly compare the performance of the different speaker arrangements you mentioned.

The error in your analysis is that "two speakers consume twice the energy as a single speaker". This is not true. What is true is that two speakers are CAPABLE OF DISSIPATING TWICE THE POWER of a single speaker. If the impedance of the two-speaker system is 8 ohms and the one-speaker system is 8 ohms and you drive both of them with the same amplifier, the same electrical power will be dissipated in each case and both systems will radiate the same amount of acoustic power. However, the two-speaker system will accomplish this with less cone displacement amplitude, as others here have pointed out.

Why run a system with two speakers instead of one? Because if one speaker is rated at 50 watts maximum input power, then two can handle 100 watts- but they will not dissipate 100 watts of power if they are being driven by a 50 watt amplifier.

Similarly, if we have an amplifier rated at 50 watts output power and we connect it to a speaker system with two speakers, then each individual speaker sees a 25 watt source (NOT 50 watts!), and a single speaker would of course see the full 50 watt output.

|cite|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

The "in phase"-ness depends on the position of the receiver. While there are positions where you'd get twice the amplitude, there are also positions with zero amplitude.

|cite|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Not if the they are close enough or play low frequency,ie wavelenght 4x longer than driver diameter.If two speakers with shape of cube with 10cm lenght where one entire side is driver surface are playing side to side 20 Hz sinewave,there is no cancellation,no zero amplitude dead spots,they act like single speaker. $\endgroup$ – wav scientist Feb 8 '18 at 19:27
-1
$\begingroup$

It's funny you say it's a mystery, of course it is not. In fact, it is in perfect agreement with physics, and your three statements are perfectly correct.

Your confusion arises because you're confusing Amplitude and Intensity. Intensity is proportional to $A^2$, which can be easily seen in any wave chapter of mechanics.

Intensity is power divided by surface. The wave is meant to be a spherical wave, so the surfaces grows as $4\pi r^2$. In sum

$I= \frac{P}{4\pi r^2} \propto A^2$

So it is perfectly right that, if you double the amplitude, you'll have 4 times the power consumed. If you had three times the amplitude, you'd get 9 times the consumption of normal amplitude.

If you add two speakers, you are just summing an identical system. The energy is an extensive quantity, so they just add up. Two systems = two times the energy of one system (if they're equal).

Finally, your third point, yes, the sound is a wave, so amplitudes add up when they coincide in the same point. If two maxima coincide, then you'll have twice the amplitude (and thus 4 times the intensity)

|cite|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I still dont understand,why arent two speakers 3db louder when their combined energy is double? Why their combined output is 6db higher amplitude? $\endgroup$ – wav scientist Feb 8 '18 at 20:00
  • $\begingroup$ dB scale is not linear. $k[dB]=10\cdot \log \left(\frac{k}{k_0}\right)$ for any quantity $k$, being $k_0$ the reference value. Undo that operation and you will see. $\endgroup$ – FGSUZ Feb 8 '18 at 20:14
  • $\begingroup$ 3db of power is double ... 6db of amplitude is double,to obtain double amplitude of sound from speaker,it requires quadruple energy.Doubling number of speakers,we double amplitude,but energy consumed is only doubled,not quadrupled as expected. $\endgroup$ – wav scientist Feb 8 '18 at 20:49
  • $\begingroup$ Sure: if you double the amplitude, you'll get 4 times the power/energy consumed. If you send a doubled signal, it will require 4 times the energy. Now you say, if you put 2 speakers, amplitudes will add, and so you will have the same situation... yes: twice amplitude, which requires twice the energy. But you only sent twice the initial energy. How can be 4 tiems the energy if you only sent two? No, you didn't create energy. The key is that you REDISTRIBUTED IT. Amplitudes only add constructively in certain positions, where you have 2A, and 4E. But there are other points with destructive one. $\endgroup$ – FGSUZ Feb 8 '18 at 22:57
  • $\begingroup$ The comment was too long. What I mean is that, with two speakers, you'll have points where two maxima add up. That's a constructive I.F. and you have 2A, 4E. However, you have other points in space where a maxima meets a minimum and the amplitude is 0, energy 0 too. So you're not creating energy, you're jsut redistributing it. Before you had E+E = 2E everywhere. Interference gives you series of 4-0-4-0... $\endgroup$ – FGSUZ Feb 8 '18 at 22:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.