Wikipedia states there is no resonance absorption, but says at the same time that the molecules are oscillating like dipoles, which is kind of the same if you are exciting the rotational levels ? The spacing in the rotational levels will be almost independent of wavelength in the $\mathrm{MHz}\, -\, \mathrm{GHz}$ range?


The Wikipedia quote you are referring to is:

Sometimes, microwave heating is explained as a resonance of water molecules, but this is incorrect;[11] such resonances occur only at above 1 terahertz (THz).

The source cited is:

Schmitt, Ron (2002). Electromagnetics Explained: a handbook for wireless/RF, EMC, and high-speed electronics. Burlington, MA, USA: Elsevier. p. 343. ISBN 978-0-7506-7403-4. Retrieved 3 December 2012.

Often I've seen Microwave heating explained as the size (wavelength) of the microwaves as being the same size as water molecules, causing them to rotate. For example this image:

false water microwave claim

This is not correct. The electromagnetic wave would have a frequency on the order of $10^{18}\, \mathrm{Hz}$ if it were.

There is a good discussion of microwave oven heating and the resonance frequency of water molecules here:

Microwave ovens operate at a frequency of 2.45 GHz (2.45x109 Hz) and this is NOT the resonant frequency of a water molecule. This frequency is much lower than the diatomic molecule resonant frequencies mentioned earlier. If 2.45 GHz were the resonant frequency of water molecules the microwaves would all be absorbed in the surface layer of a substance (liquid water or food) and so the interior of the food would not get cooked at all.

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Don't we not even expect discrete rotational bands to exist in the liquid phase? $\endgroup$ – user4552 May 3 '13 at 0:54
  • $\begingroup$ @BenCrowell yes, with band center up at 30-50GHz. Don't forget that 27MHz medical diathermy is also heating water by dielectric absorption, just like microwaves do. It's the dipole rotation and ruptured bonds which heat the water, not an EM resonance. $\endgroup$ – wbeaty Aug 29 '17 at 23:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.