1
$\begingroup$

I have come across a few situations involving leaking and loading freight cars being pushed with a constant force. Here, I present two situations that leave me in doubt.

1) A car of mass $M_0$( sand of mass $m$ included ) at rest experiences a constant force $F$ at $t=0$ and starts to leak from the bottom at a constant rate $b$ at the same time. I am to calculate its speed when all the sand leaks out.

Here, I am concerned with the system's horizontal momentum.

I have, $P(0) = 0$ and $P(t) = (M_0 - m)v + x $, where $t$ is the time taken for all the sand to leak out, $v$ is the speed attained by the car at $t$ and $x$ is the momentum of the escaped sand subsystem.

Since the mass of the system remains unchanged, I have, $\Delta P = (M_0 - m)v + x = \int_{0}^{t} F \mathrm dt$

I do not see myself in a position to calculate $x$, and that is why I'm not sure if this approach is correct. While I do know the solution to this question( a different approach ), I would like to know if there are any flaws with my reasoning here. Can I expect the right answer if $x$ is correctly known?

The next question concerns the loading of a freight car.

2) A freight car of mass $M$ starts from rest under an applied force $F$. At the same time, sand begins to run into the car at a steady rate $b$ from a hopper at rest along the track. I am to calculate its speed when a mass $m$ of sand has been transferred.

enter image description here

Once again, I'm concerned with the system's$( M + m )$ horizontal momentum. I am given, $\frac{\mathrm d M_{\mathrm car}}{\mathrm dt} =b$. Mass of the freight car at any time $t$ is then found out to be $M + bt$.

At some time $t$ I have, $P(t) = (M + bt) v$, where $v$ is the speed at that time.

Sometime later, $P(t+\Delta t) = (M + bt + b\Delta t) (v + \Delta v)$

The average rate of change of momentum is given by, $ \frac{\Delta P}{\Delta t} = ( M + bt) \frac{\Delta v}{\Delta t} + b( v + \Delta v) $

When I take $\Delta t \rightarrow 0 $, I see that the net external force depends on the speed of the car. This is an absurd result because if I shift my origin from my current inertial frame to another inertial frame( moving with a different speed ), the force acting on the car will be different. This is not possible. Where could I have gone wrong with my reasoning? The solution to this question is simple. However, I am curious to know where I went wrong.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Could you explain: from the last equation of second problem, when $\Delta{t}$ goes to zero, how do you gather dependency on velocity ? $\endgroup$ – npojo Jan 17 '18 at 5:50
  • $\begingroup$ @npojo $\Delta P$ gives me $(M+bt) \Delta v + b\Delta t(v + \Delta v) $. On dividing by $\Delta t$ we get the last equation. $\endgroup$ – R004 Jan 17 '18 at 5:54
  • $\begingroup$ I understand that. I am talking about the next step. You obtain a complex equation involving both v and acceleration which should be equated to a constant force and then resolved for v and a. Sort of the other way around from your statement. $\endgroup$ – npojo Jan 17 '18 at 6:00
  • $\begingroup$ @npojo Correct me if I'm wrong. I get $F=(M + bt)\frac{\mathrm d v}{\mathrm dt}+ bv$. According to the solution( which makes sense unlike mine ), $bv$ should not be there in the equation. $\endgroup$ – R004 Jan 17 '18 at 6:21
  • $\begingroup$ bv is a reminiscence of b kg of sand which instantly gained velocity of v when reaching the car. Why shouldn't it be there? $\endgroup$ – npojo Jan 17 '18 at 6:30
1
$\begingroup$

There is an asymmetry your two problems (as well as an error in an answer by Mark):

When sand with initial zero horizontal velocity lands on the car already moving with a speed $v$, there is a case of inelastic collision in which a mass of sand $dm=b \, dt$ instantaneously acquires speed $v$, so there should also be a force, corresponding to the momentum we need to impart to accelerate this inflowing sand. The magnitude of this additional force is $$|F_1|=\frac{dp}{dt} = \frac{v\, dm }{dt}=\frac{v\, b dt}{dt}=b v,$$ and the direction is opposite $v$. This additional force is absent in your first case since the sand leaves with the same horizontal speed as the car.

If you consider this situation in a different inertial frame moving horizontally with a speed $u$, then the sand dumped into the car would have a nonzero impulse $dp = u \, dm $, and so its speed would need to be changed by $v-u$ to move with the speed of the car. So, you are not wrong: the net force in the second case does depend on the speed of a car.

And so, if while the car is moving under the hopper we dump into it total mass $m$ of sand the speed at the end is calculated by solving the differential equation $$ \frac{dv(t)}{dt}=\frac{F_1+ F}{M(t)}=\frac{-b\, v(t)+F}{M+b\,t}, $$ subject to initial condition $v(0)=0$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ This clears it for me. +1 $\endgroup$ – R004 Jan 17 '18 at 7:23
0
$\begingroup$

There are times when momentum calculations are a handy shortcut for solving physics problems. This isn't one of them.

To calculate the change in velocity of an object after a given period of acceleration, you integrate the acceleration from $t_0$ to $t_1$: $v = \int_{t_0}^{t_1} a(t) dt$. Now, the problem doesn't give you acceleration, it gives you force. But you can use Newton's laws to get acceleration from force by $F = ma$, or solving for $a$, $a = F/m$.

In both problems, the mass isn't constant. It's increasing or increasing at a rate $b$, from which you can derive a formula for mass over time: $M(t) = M_0 + bt$.

The final pieces you need are the time $t$ over which the force is applied and the initial velocity (which shows up as the constant of integration). You can get the time by dividing the mass $m$ added or lost by the rate $b$ of change, and the initial velocity is given to you as $0$.

Substitute the formula for M(t) into the acceleration formula, substitute that into the velocity integral, set $t_0$ to 0 and $t_1$ to the end time you found, and solve.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.