0
$\begingroup$

My goal is to understand the meaning of the extraction ratio (artificial kidney, not other systems). I have the system in figure ($Q$ volumetric flow, $C$ concentration, the red line is a permeable membrane):

enter image description here

On my book (page 320 Cooney - Biomedical engineering principles) there is the definition of a parameter, the extraction ratio (note that all concentrations are evaluated at the same time):

$$E=\frac{C_{Ai}(t)-C_{Ao}(t)}{C_{Ai}(t)-C_{Bi}(t)}$$ where E is constant ($Q_A$ and $Q_B$ are constants).

In words, it say the extraction ratio "represents the amount of solute concentration change achieved relative to what would result from complete equilibrium with a very large supply" of liquid B "having a concentration $C_{Bi}$.

At page 549 of Saltzman - Biomedical Engineering, it say "The extraction ratio, E, is the solute concentration change" in the liquid A "compared to the theoretical solute concentration change that would occur if the" liquid A and B "came to equilibrium".

Mathematically what does mean equilibrium? Maybe $C_{Ao}=C_{Bo}$ or $C_{Ai}=C_{Bi}$ or $C_{A}=C_{B}$ for all value of $x$ or...?

Morover, how can I see mathematically the two terms of the comparison?

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

This ratio seem to express the actual concentration gained by A : $\Delta C_A = C_{A}(i) - C_{A}(0)$ divided by the maximum gain this system can have, which is given by : $\Delta^{MAX} C_A = C_{A}(i) - C_{B}(i)$.

To understand why the second is the maximum gain, consider the static case where you let the two fluid for an infinite time from $C_A(i)$ on the A side and $C_B(i)$ and the B side and assume that B is infinitely large, ie its concentration will not change as it is giving particule to the A side. In the end, the A side will be at equilibrium with the B side with a constration of $C_{A}(t=\infty) = C_B(i)$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hello @sailx, thus there are not the two terms of the comparison in the formula of E? $\endgroup$ – Gennaro Arguzzi Jan 7 '18 at 11:25
  • $\begingroup$ sorry, it was a typo. I was confused by the notation $\endgroup$ – sailx Jan 8 '18 at 9:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.