0
$\begingroup$

Riemann curvature s denoted by $R^a_{bcd}$. If you try to attempt to parallel transport a tangent vector $\psi$ along an infinitesimal parallelogram given by two tangent vectors along non-parallel sides as $\eta$ and $\nu$, the following holds true. $$\psi^a_{;cd} - \psi^a_{;dc} = R^a_{cdb}\psi^b$$ where the $;$ indicates covariant differentiation. Here the $c$ and $d$ on the L.H.S. implies the two directions of the parallelogram. My professor said that the Riemann curvature tensor denotes the extent of the non commutativity of the covariant diferentiation along directions. In flat space, I would expect the Riemann Tensor to be zero. But does this imply commutativty of covariant differentiaton? Because covariant differentiation of a vector along a direction denotes how much the vector deviates during the parallel transport and one would not expect a deviation in flat space. So this should make the left hand side zero independent of the right hand side. What do you think?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Note that it is not the commutativity of covariant derivatives, but, specifically, the commutativity of the 2nd-order covariant derivatives! $\endgroup$ – Dr. Ikjyot Singh Kohli Dec 30 '17 at 23:59
0
$\begingroup$

In flat space the covariant derivative reduces to the partial derivative (by definition). The partial derivatives do commute, hence the L.H.S. vanishes and the R.H.S., that is the Riemann tensor, measures zero.
Just a comment on the statement, it should be:
$\psi^a_{;cd} - \psi^a_{;dc} = R^a_{bdc}\psi^b$
As I know the indices of the non-parallel sides of the infinitesimal parallelogram should be the third and the fourth. A possible ambiguity remains in the sign, as you can decide which way of the loop to assume as positive, however it is a matter of convention.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ If the covariant derivative reduces to the partial derivative, the notion is still that of parallel transporting vector $\psi$. In this case, it might help to think of $\psi$ as a constant vector field $\psi(x)$ over the manifold. Partial differentiating a constant vector field at any point would give zero for each of the terms individually on the L.H.S. Would this be correct? $\endgroup$ – IanDsouza Dec 31 '17 at 22:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ However in a flat manifold the parallel transport is independent of the path, so after a loop it delivers the same vector. No change in the vector means a zero R.H.S. in any case. $\endgroup$ – Michele Grosso Jan 1 '18 at 18:07
0
$\begingroup$

The right hand side in that equation is identically $=0$ since the component of the vector are smooth and the covariant derivative reduces to partial derivative, in fact the $\Gamma$s are zero in a flat space.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.