4
$\begingroup$

A problem in my textbook states:

Using the uncertainty principle, find the minimum value (in MeV) of the kinetic energy of a nucleon confined within a nucleus of radius $R = 5 \times 10^{-15}$m.

Given the Heisenberg uncertainty principle: $$ \Delta x \Delta p \geqslant \frac{\hbar}{2} $$

I understand one can, using either classical or relativistic formulae for kinetic energy, and plugging in the value for $R$, solve for the energy and find a solution of the form: $$ \Delta pc \geqslant \frac{\hbar c}{2\Delta x} $$ or $$ \frac{\Delta p^2}{2m} \geqslant \frac{\hbar^2}{2m\Delta x^2} $$

Now I fail to understand how these solutions (given to be correct by the textbook) actually imply a minimum energy. To me it seems that these solutions rather imply a minimum uncertainty in energy. Does this minimum energy-uncertainty imply an equal minimum energy, and if so, why?

I read elsewhere that since it is implied that the uncertainty of a quantity (in this case energy) is smaller than its magnitude, the minimum uncertainty also serves as a lower bound for the magnitude. I should therefore rephrase my question as follows:

Is it usually the case that one can assume such a quantity to have a larger magnitude than uncertainty, and if not, can this be assumed for a general case such as this one?

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

This question is pretty old now, so I would answer the following. Consider a particle inside some box. Its hamiltonian is $$\tag{1} H = \frac{p^2}{2m}. $$ The state of lowest energy is $|E_{0}\rangle$ and you have $$\tag{2} \Delta p \ge \frac{\hbar}{2 \Delta x}, $$ where $\Delta x$ is about the size of the box. Then you have, since $\Delta p^2 \equiv \langle p^2 \rangle - \langle p \rangle^2$ : \begin{align} \langle E \rangle_0 \equiv \langle E_0 | H | E_0 \rangle = \frac{\langle p^2 \rangle}{2m} &\equiv \frac{\Delta p^2}{2 m} + \frac{\langle p \rangle^2}{2m} \\[12pt] &\ge \frac{\hbar^2}{8 m \Delta x^2} + \frac{\langle p \rangle^2}{2m} \ge \frac{\hbar^2}{8 m \Delta x^2}. \tag{3} \end{align} Then obviously there's a minimum value to the energy (the state vector $| E_0 \rangle$ is an eigen-ket of the hamiltonian (1) with minimal energy $E_0$).

For an ultra-relativistic particle, I would use the hamiltonian $H = p c$. Then $H^2 = p^2 c^2$ and \begin{align} E_0^2 \equiv \langle H^2 \rangle_0 = \langle p^2 \rangle c^2 &\equiv \Delta p^2 c^2 + \langle p \rangle^2 c^2 \\[12pt] &\ge \frac{\hbar^2 c^2}{4 \Delta x^2} + \langle p \rangle^2 c^2 \ge \frac{\hbar^2 c^2}{4 \Delta x^2}, \tag{4} \end{align} thus $$\tag{5} E_0 \ge \frac{\hbar c}{2 \Delta x}. $$

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ You beat me to it, I was just about to post a very similar answer. $\endgroup$ – user137661 Oct 28 '19 at 20:39
  • $\begingroup$ Although it does not address the relativistic case in the OP's question. $\endgroup$ – user137661 Oct 28 '19 at 20:40
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @SV, I've added something for a relativistic particle. $\endgroup$ – Cham Oct 28 '19 at 21:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.