It seems that the quark pair superconductor can be odd or even parity pairing respect to the parity $P$.

Say that the even parity has the form: $$ \langle\psi C \gamma^5 \psi\rangle $$

the odd parity has the form: $$ \langle\psi C \psi\rangle $$ There is no difference at perturbative computation. $C$ is charge conjugate matrix.

But the literature seems to suggest that instanton effect favors the even parity not the odd parity. I look into the literature but the original paper seems not to assert that claim. Refs cited here

Do you have either a simple and intuitive or a rigorous analytic explanation of the claim?


This requires an actual calculation (and getting the signs right), see for example https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9810509 .

There are some simple heuristics. For example, there is a successful quark-scalar-diquark model of the nucleon. Lattice QCD practioners know that the nucleon couples strongly to $$ \eta_S = \psi (\psi C\gamma_5 C) $$ but not to $$ \eta_{PS} = \gamma_5\psi ( \psi C\psi) $$

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, you final form is kind of abstrat, not sure what it implies... $\endgroup$ – annie marie heart Dec 25 '17 at 4:24
  • $\begingroup$ +1, but do you agree that the gap function in $k$ space has $\Delta(k)=-\Delta(k)$ for even parity, and $\Delta(k)=+\Delta(k)$ for odd parity? This is kind of counter intuition but I wanted to make sure your odd even parity means the same thing $\endgroup$ – annie marie heart Dec 25 '17 at 4:26
  • $\begingroup$ No, there is no difference in the symmetry of the gap function. This is just a relative phase. The two order parameters are $\psi_L\psi_L\pm \psi_R\psi_R$. $\endgroup$ – Thomas Dec 25 '17 at 4:54
  • $\begingroup$ but when you convert to the k space, like in the BdG equation, you should see the potential difference of $\Delta(k)$. See any condensed matter BdG equation. $\endgroup$ – annie marie heart Dec 25 '17 at 5:02
  • $\begingroup$ No. The $J^\pi=0^\pm$ order parameters have the same gap function. The simplest way to get an odd gap function is to consider $p$ wave pairing, $J^\pi=1^\pm$. $\endgroup$ – Thomas Dec 25 '17 at 6:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.