Does the Ampère-Maxwell law fail for the field of a uniformly moving point charge? I think I found a terrible contradiction in the Ampère-Maxwell law (the 4th Maxwell equation) that really baffles me.
If a point charge q is in motion in vacuo with constant velocity $ \vec v $, it causes an electric field $ \vec E $ as well as a magnetic field $ \vec B $ at a point P. The vector-position $ \vec r $ of the point P with respect to the charge, the charge itself and $ \vec v $ determine a plane. We can imagine the charge moving along the x-axis of a cartesian plane, its equation of motion given by $ x = x_0 + vt $, $ v = \dfrac {dx}{dt} $ = const. while the point P is located at a permanent position on the y-axis, y(P) = const.

The electric field caused by the charge q at P is given by
\begin{equation}
\vec E(P) = \dfrac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \dfrac{1 - v^2/c^2}{[1 - (v^2/c^2) sin^2 \phi]^{3/2}} \dfrac{1}{r^2} \hat r
\tag{01}
\end{equation}
and the magnetic field is given by
\begin{equation}
 \vec B(P) = \dfrac{\mu_0 q}{4 \pi} \dfrac{1 - v^2/c^2}{[1 - (v^2/c^2) sin^2 \phi]^{3/2}} \dfrac{\vec v \times \hat r}{r^2} 
\tag{02}
\end{equation}
So the electric field, being radial to the charge, is contained in the x0y plane, while the magnetic field is perpendicular to the same.
The Ampère-Maxwell law states that $$ \operatorname{curl} \vec B = \epsilon_0 \mu_0 \dfrac{\partial \vec E}{\partial t} $$
And we have
$$ \vec B = \epsilon_0 \mu_0 \vec v \times \vec E = \dfrac{\vec v \times \vec E}{c^2} $$
$$  \vec v \times \vec E = vE_y \hat z $$
$$ B_x = 0 $$ $$ B_y = 0 $$ $$ B_z = \dfrac{v}{c^2} E_y $$
Therefore $$ \operatorname{curl} \vec B = \dfrac{v}{c^2} \left[ \dfrac{\partial E_y}{\partial y} \hat x - \dfrac{\partial E_y}{\partial E_x} \hat y \right] $$
Calculating the derivative of $ \vec E $ with respect to time, we get
$$ \dfrac{dE_x}{dt} = \dfrac{qv}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \left( 1 - \dfrac{v^2}{c^2} \right) \left[ x^2 + y^2 \left( 1 - \dfrac{v^2}{c^2} \right) \right]^\dfrac{-3}{2} \left[ 3x^2 \left[ x^2 + y^2 \left( 1 - \dfrac{v^2}{c^2} \right) \right]^{-1} -1 \right] $$
$$ \dfrac{dE_y}{dt} = - \dfrac{qv}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \left( 1 - \dfrac{v^2}{c^2} \right) 3xy \left[ x^2 + y^2 \left( 1 - \dfrac{v^2}{c^2} \right) \right]^\dfrac{-5}{2} $$
Then, when I calculate $ \dfrac{\partial E_y}{\partial y} $ and $ \dfrac{\partial E_y}{\partial x} $ to insert in the above formula for $ \operatorname{curl} \vec B $, I do not obtain an equality to my surprise, which indicates that the law of Ampère-Maxwell may not be valid in this case.
So the following three propositions cannot be all true:


*

*The formulas given above to calculate the electric and magnetic field at point P are correct.

*The derivatives above were calculated correctly.

*The law of Ampère-Maxwell is correct as stated.


Which one of them is false?
 A: This is more a contribution to the discussion as an answer.
In math.stackexchange I asked about the extreme value for the equation (2). For the charges velocity near c and a small distance to the observer there is an answer that the magnetic field tends to infinity. This seems to be strange because a charge (including its field) has a limited energy content only and according the theory the rise of the magnetic field is accompanied by the weakening of the electric field.
But there is another point with the equations (1) and (2). We can rewrite them
\begin{equation}
\vec E(P) = \dfrac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} C \dfrac{1}{r^2} \hat r
\tag{01}
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}
 \vec B(P) = \dfrac{\mu_0 q}{4 \pi} C \dfrac{\vec v \times \hat r}{r^2} 
\tag{02}
\end{equation}
Now neglecting C (which perhaps is not allowed, but this is for discussion) B tends to infinity for v near c. E stays unchanged. But by theory E has to decrease with increasing v?
Anymore, I’ve never heard that the magnetic field of charges in particle accelerators increases to infinity. On the other side the field has to increase due to theory.
Why I made this contribution to a discussion? Because my point of view is that a charge has not only an permanent electric field and a permanent magnetic dipole moment. The magnetic dipole moments of charges are randomly distributed and their influence is unnoticed. Under motion the magnetic dipole moments get aligned and a macroscopic magnetic field occurs. The strength of the magnetic field depends from the alignment of the charges only and not from the absolute value of their velocity.
