1
$\begingroup$

Case study, the oscillation of the spring and the source of coulomb damping

This is my first time posting anything, but I could not figure out the derivation of the amplitude of the spring for the 4 first oscillations. I am not acquainted with the effect and calculations of damping since I am only in high school. This is an assignment I have, I think I am in over my head, but I have invested too much time in this to change the topic. I figure that the only deviation to the classic coulomb damping where the source of energy dissipation is due to the weight sliding on top of a surface, and the force of friction is constant and does not change, is that the friction coefficient changes as more coils enter the paper cylinder which is compressing the spring (i believe this affects the friction). The values that I have is the frictional force of when the entire spring is within the paper cylinder, the mass of the weight, the initial elongation of the spring (x naught) and the spring constant. classical coulomb damping case . If anyone can help me with my assignment I would be eternally thankful! If not, I would gladly take any help with deriving the amplitude of the classic coulomb damping case as seen above as a backup. Moreover, If there is any rule that I am breaking with this post, let me know. This is as previously stated, the first time that I post anything, and it is due to pure desperation as I am way in over my head! Thanks in advance!

As to not get the assignment done for me, could any kind souls help me understand what the constants are before the sin and cos in the equation for the amplitude or displacement x . It is stated to be derived from the initial conditions, but they often lack any clear description of how that is done. The constants in question are "C1, C2, C3 and C4" as seen in the attached picture below. enter image description here

Most websites that do cover damping only covers viscous damping to a reasonable degree, coulomb or dry friction damping often take a backseat. So it is quite hard for me to figure out how to tackle this assignment, any help is appreciated!

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hi and welcome to the Physics SE! I hope you get some help, but note that we don't answer homework or worked example type questions. Please see this Meta post on asking homework/exercise questions and this Meta post for "check my work" problems. You might want to consider posting on some other Physics website, such as the PhysicsForums. $\endgroup$
    – stafusa
    Commented Dec 13, 2017 at 19:32
  • $\begingroup$ Oh, ok. Is it okay if I ask about how damping works in general then? $\endgroup$
    – Sam
    Commented Dec 13, 2017 at 20:18
  • $\begingroup$ Of course, just do a check before (google) to confirm it's not already well-known and, if it's still not clear, do ask about it. $\endgroup$
    – stafusa
    Commented Dec 13, 2017 at 20:19
  • $\begingroup$ You mention that you have a value for the frictional force. Is this an experiment which you have done? Do you have results? $\endgroup$
    – sammy gerbil
    Commented Dec 15, 2017 at 1:22
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, I used a dynamometer to measure the dry friction between the spring and paper cylinder. It was 1.15 ± 0.025 N. The spring constant was 20.46 Kg/m. The initial displacement was 0.053 meters. The mass used was 100mg. The oscillations were carried out in an experiment 15 times, and the averages of the amplitudes were taken and put into a graph which is shown here: gyazo.com/5ca1220e1d7e012d914aebfb22ec8c7d . I noticed that there was a trend with the amplitude decay, it was as seen in this screenshot gyazo.com/81150642375f138c3d654c3a5f5d2449 . The first amplitude deviates $\endgroup$
    – Sam
    Commented Dec 15, 2017 at 18:25

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
0
$\begingroup$

The solution which you have got relates to the mass on a spring on a horizontal rough surface, as in your 2nd diagram. The constants $C_{1,2}$ depend on the initial conditions : ie the displacement $x$ and velocity $\dot x$ at time $t=0$. The constant $\delta$ takes account of the fact that $x$ might not be measured from the equilibrium position $x_0$ given by $kx_0=mg$. If the spring is released from stationary then $C_2=0$.

The two cases are half-cycles of a sinusoidal motion. The amplitude of each half-cycle decreases linearly. This can be shown from the work-energy theorem, eg s 4.1 of this document. See also A Piecewise-Conserved Constant of Motion for a Dissipative System and Oscillator damped by a constant-magnitude friction force.

The motion of a spring sliding through a rough paper sheath is more difficult to analyse. As you have realised, the amount of friction depends on the number of coils in the sheath. This is proportional to the fraction of the spring in contact with it, which is $\frac{L}{L_0+x}$ where $L$ is the length of the sheath, $L_0$ is the natural length of the spring, and $x$ is its extension.

Assuming that the spring obeys Hooke's Law the equation of motion is
$$m\ddot x=mg -kx - sgn(\dot x)C\frac{L}{L_0+x}$$ where $C$ is a constant which depends on the roughness of the contact, and $sgn(\dot x)$ is the sign of $\dot x$. This equation probably does not have any algebraic solution. You would have to solve it numerically.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Are you sure that the x is in the denominator? Would this not mean that friction increases as the displacement from the equilibrium decreases? That is counter-intuitive. I agree with the fraction of L over L0, but surely the displacement should be multiplied by L on the numerator, or? $\endgroup$
    – Sam
    Commented Dec 16, 2017 at 21:23
  • $\begingroup$ I am measuring $x$ downwards, so the total length of the spring is $L_0+x$. The longer the spring gets, the fewer coils in the sheath, and the less the friction. $\endgroup$
    – sammy gerbil
    Commented Dec 16, 2017 at 21:35
  • $\begingroup$ Oh, I see now what you mean. I thought x was the displacement from the equilibrium, but if you use x as the length from when the spring is fully compressed, it makes sense! Moreover, I asked my brother with help on the equation but he couldn't solve it, I don't think it can be expected of me to solve this since it has to be done numerically (which is something we both had to google). I thought that this lab rapport was going to be much easier than it actually was, but the journey was great! Learnt a thing or two about the marvels of physics and mathematics. Lastly, thank you for all the help! $\endgroup$
    – Sam
    Commented Dec 17, 2017 at 9:36
  • $\begingroup$ One last question, why is the force of gravity "mg" in your equation but absent from the equation for the horizontal spring which I solved? What effect will it have on the solution if you solved the horizontal spring $\endgroup$
    – Sam
    Commented Dec 17, 2017 at 9:40
  • $\begingroup$ For the horizontal spring the weight $mg$ is vertical and is balanced by the normal reaction, so there is no acceleration vertically. The only unbalanced forces are spring force and friction horizontally, so the acceleration is horizontal. For the vertical spring gravity, spring force and friction are all vertical. $\endgroup$
    – sammy gerbil
    Commented Dec 17, 2017 at 9:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.