The time when the Universe was $200\,{\rm Myr}$ old corresponds to a cosmological redshift (relative to today) of about $z\sim19$ (I calculated this assuming the WMAP7 cosmology). From this you can work out several interesting facts about the Universe at that time. One is that the average density was a factor of $(1+z)$ higher than it is now. This applies to the average across the entire Universe, so the local density it not necessarily enhanced by the same factor, e.g. you can't estimate the number density of stars in the proto-MW this way. However, there is plenty of evidence that early galaxies had much higher densities of gas and star formation (based on observations at $z\sim2-3$, not $z=19$!), so there were likely many more young, bright, blue stars around your hypothetical planet than there are around Earth.
Another easy calculation is the temperature of the CMB, which scales as $T(1+z)$, and so would have been about $60\,{\rm K}$ rather than the $3\,{\rm K}$ or so that it is today.
The biggest difference I can think of is that $z\sim20$ is thought to be before the so-called epoch of re-ionization. Most of the gas in the Universe at this time would be neutral and thus largely opaque to optical photons. There would be pockets of ionized gas around stars and proto-galaxies, but with the exception of perhaps a handful of nearby proto-galaxies whose ionization regions might overlap with that of the proto-MW, other galaxies would not be visible.