2
$\begingroup$

I saw a answer for Why are these two definitions for symmetries in the Lagrangian equivalent?

I have an example has $\delta \mathcal{L}=0$ but $\delta S \neq 0$ and $$\delta S \neq \epsilon \int_{\partial\Omega} d^3 x f .\tag{1} $$

Action $$S=\int_\Omega d^4x~\mathcal{L},\tag{2}$$ $$\mathcal{L}=\frac{1}{2}(\partial_t \phi(t,\mathbf{x}))^2 -\frac{1}{2}(\partial_\mathbf{x} \phi(t,\mathbf{x}))^2.\tag{3}$$

Transformation: $$x\rightarrow x'=\lambda x,\tag{4}$$ $$\phi(x)\rightarrow\phi'(x')=\lambda\phi(x).\tag{5}$$

This transformation has $$\delta\mathcal{L}=\mathcal{L}(\partial_{x'}\phi'(x'),\phi'(x'))-\mathcal{L}(\partial_{x}\phi(x),\phi(x))=0, \tag{6}$$ $$\delta S= \frac{1}{2}\int_{\Omega'} d^4x' ((\partial_{t'} \phi(t',\mathbf{x'}))^2 -(\partial_{\mathbf{x}'} \phi(t',\mathbf{x}'))^2) - \frac{1}{2}\int_\Omega d^4x ((\partial_t \phi(t,\mathbf{x}))^2 -(\partial_\mathbf{x} \phi(t,\mathbf{x}))^2)=(\lambda^4-1)S\tag{7}$$

Note: $$\int_{\Omega'}d^4x'=\int_{\Omega}|\frac{\partial x'^\mu}{\partial x^\nu}|d^4x=\int_{\Omega}\lambda^4 d^4 x.\tag{8}$$

My question:

According to this answer, this transformation is L$1$ but is not S$1$ or S$2$. So does this transformation has conserved current? I feel like it's not a symmetry.

PS: According to Qmechanic's answer: there're two different definition of $\delta \mathcal{L}$

The first one:

$$\delta_1 \mathcal{L}=\mathcal{L}(\phi'(x'),\partial'_\mu\phi'(x'),x')-\mathcal{L}(\phi(x ),\partial _\mu\phi (x ),x )= [\mathcal{L}]_\phi \bar\delta \phi+\partial_\mu(\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)}\bar\delta \phi)+ (\partial_\mu \mathcal{L})\delta x^\mu$$

The second one:

$$\delta_2 \mathcal{L}=J \mathcal{L}(\phi'(x'),\partial'_\mu\phi'(x'),x')-\mathcal{L}(\phi(x ),\partial _\mu\phi (x ),x )$$ with Jacobian $J$ $$J=\det(\frac{\partial x'^\mu}{\partial x^\nu})$$

$$\delta_2 \mathcal{L}=[\mathcal{L}]_\phi \bar\delta \phi+\partial_\mu(\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)}\bar\delta \phi)+ \partial_\mu (\mathcal{L}\delta x^\mu) = \delta_1 \mathcal{L}+ \mathcal{L} (\partial_\mu \delta x^\mu)$$

When we consider the symmetry transformation, we need to compute $\delta_2 \mathcal{L}$ instead of $\delta_1 \mathcal{L}$. After using the definition of $\delta_2 \mathcal{L}$, the symmetry defined by $\delta_2 \mathcal{L}$ is always consistent to the symmetry defined by $\delta S$.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

I) The infinitesimal version of OP's transformation is $$\begin{align}\text{Total:}&\qquad \phi^{\prime}(x^{\prime})-\phi(x)~=~\delta \phi~=~\varepsilon~\phi, \tag{A}\cr \text{Horizontal:}&\qquad x^{\prime\mu} -x^{\mu} ~=~\delta x^{\mu}~=~\varepsilon~ x^{\mu}, \tag{B}\cr \text{Vertical:}&\qquad\phi^{\prime}(x)-\phi(x)~=~ \delta_0 \phi~=~\varepsilon~ (1-x^{\mu}d_{\mu})\phi, \tag{C} \end{align}$$ where $\varepsilon$ is an infinitesimal parameter.

II) The action is $$S[\phi]~=~\int_{\Omega} \mathbb{L}; \tag{D}$$ the Lagrangian 4-form is $$ \mathbb{L}~=~{\cal L}~ d^4x; \tag{E}$$ and the Lagrangian density is $$ {\cal L}~=~\frac{1}{2}d_{\mu}\phi ~d^{\mu}\phi. \tag{F} $$

III) The Lagrangian density ${\cal L}$ naively transforms as $$ \delta {\cal L}~=~\delta_0 {\cal L}+ \delta x^{\mu} d_{\mu}{\cal L}~=~0 . \qquad\longleftarrow \text{Naive calculation.} \tag{G}$$ However, in case of non-zero horizontal transformations, formula (G) is not a decisive quantity for Noether's theorem, and one should rather look at the action $$ \delta S~=~4\varepsilon ~S ,\tag{H}$$ or at least the Lagrangian 4-form $$ \delta \mathbb{L}~=~4\varepsilon ~\mathbb{L} .\tag{I}$$ Eq. (H) agrees with OP's eq. (7). The issue is that the Lagrangian density ${\cal L}$ is not a scalar but a density, so there is a non-trivial contribution ${\cal L}d_{\mu}\delta x^{\mu}$ coming from the Jacobian of the integration measure $d^4x$. Therefore the decisive quantity for Noether's theorem is not formula (G) but rather $$ "\delta {\cal L}"~=~\delta {\cal L}+{\cal L}d_{\mu}\delta x^{\mu} ~=~\delta_0 {\cal L}+ d_{\mu}(\delta x^{\mu}{\cal L})~=~4\varepsilon ~{\cal L} .\tag{J}$$

IV) In conclusion, the infinitesimal transformation (A)-(C) is not a quasisymmetry for the action (D) nor the Lagrangian density (F), and Noether's theorem does not apply.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Is this what my updated PS means ? $\endgroup$ – maplemaple Dec 11 '17 at 21:59
  • $\begingroup$ $\uparrow$ Yes. $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Dec 12 '17 at 14:32
0
$\begingroup$

Consider an infinitesimal version of this transformation, given by $\lambda=1+\epsilon$. With this choice, the field and coordinate variations are

$$\delta\phi = \epsilon\phi,\hspace{0.5cm}\delta x=\epsilon x.$$

Under these variations, the action transforms as

$$\delta S=\int_{\Omega'}\mathrm{d}^4x\,\mathcal{L}-\int_{\Omega}\mathrm{d}^4x\,\mathcal{L}.$$

Note that I allowed the same variable $x$ to parametrize both the regions $\Omega$ and $\Omega'$, since these are dummy variables. The only thing that changes is the domain. Thus, the change in the action is

$$\delta S=\int_{\Omega'\setminus\Omega}\mathrm{d}^4x\,\mathcal{L}.$$

If $\Omega$ is a convex set in $\mathbb{R}^4$, then $\Omega'\setminus\Omega$ is a set that is essentially $\partial\Omega$ with thickness $\epsilon$ (this idea can be generalized to non-convex sets, but it becomes a bit more complicated and I really don't want to think about it that much). Thus, in the infinitesimal limit, the integral reduces to

$$\delta S=\epsilon\int_{\partial\Omega}\mathrm{d}^4x\,\mathcal{L},$$

et voilà! Your transformation is now type S2!

I hope this helps!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ See my added note. I think your delta S is incorrect $\endgroup$ – maplemaple Dec 10 '17 at 6:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.