The Dirac Equation is given by $$\left(i\gamma^\mu\partial_\mu- \frac{mc}{\hbar}\right)\Psi_D = 0,$$

where $\gamma^\mu$ are the Dirac $\gamma$-matrices and $\Psi_D$ is a Dirac spinor. I would like to find the transformation $U$ such that the two-component Weyl spinors $\Psi, \hat{\Psi}$ solve the equation $$i\left( \begin{array}{cc}0 & \partial_0+\vec\sigma\cdot\vec\nabla \\ \partial_0 - \vec\sigma\cdot\vec\nabla & 0\end{array}\right) \left(\begin{array}{c}\Psi\\\hat{\Psi}\end{array} \right) - \frac{mc}{\hbar}\left(\begin{array}{c}\Psi\\\hat{\Psi}\end{array} \right) = 0$$

if $\Psi_D = U \left(\begin{array}{c}\Psi\\\hat{\Psi}\end{array} \right)$ solves the Dirac equation. Could anybody show me how to derive the tranformation matrix $U$? I read everywhere that

$$ U = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(1-\gamma^5\gamma^0),$$

but obviously, I don't know how to arrive at this.


1 Answer 1


Your second equation still is the Dirac equation in the chiral (Weyl) basis of the gamma matrices, which uniformizes $\gamma^0$ with $\gamma^k$, and is diagonal in chirality, $\gamma^5$,
$$\gamma^0 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & \mathbb{1} \\ \mathbb{1} & 0 \end{pmatrix},\quad \gamma^k = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & \sigma^k \\ -\sigma^k & 0 \end{pmatrix},\quad \gamma^5 = \begin{pmatrix} -\mathbb{1} & 0 \\ 0 & \mathbb{1} \end{pmatrix},$$ and all you have to do is plug in the gamma matrices.

I assume you then want to go to this Weyl basis from the conventional Dirac basis, $$\gamma^0 = \begin{pmatrix} \mathbb{1} & 0 \\ 0 & -\mathbb{1} \end{pmatrix},\quad \gamma^k = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & \sigma^k \\ -\sigma^k & 0 \end{pmatrix},\quad \gamma^5 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & \mathbb{1} \\ \mathbb{1} & 0 \end{pmatrix}.$$

The unitary similarity transform of the Dirac basis $$\gamma_W^\mu=U^\dagger \gamma_D^\mu U, \qquad U=(1-\gamma_D^5 \gamma_D^0)/\sqrt{2}= \frac{1}{ \sqrt{2}}\begin{pmatrix}\mathbb{1} &\mathbb{1}\\ -\mathbb{1} & \mathbb{1}\end{pmatrix} $$
does the trick, as designed, $$ U^\dagger\left(i\gamma_D^\mu\partial_\mu- \frac{mc}{\hbar}\right)U ~ U^\dagger\Psi_D = 0, $$ providing the chirally decoupled equation in the Weyl basis (your 2-2 vector) you wrote down explicitly.

  • Note I am sticking to the P&S, WP, left-up-right-down conventions. It is customary to waste 10 minutes comparing texts translating conventions... A part of the course. Tong, Itzykson & Zuber (appendix A-2), etc., differ.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.