0
$\begingroup$

My lecturer reaffirmed to us a classical misnomer that mass is relativistic, by pointing out that when considering relativistic momentum the Lorentz Factor is due to time dilation and thus a change in velocity, not mass.

$$\vec p = m(\gamma \vec v) \ne (\gamma m)\vec v$$

Why then, if mass is indeed invariant, due we say things have rest masses if its rest mass, should, in principle, not change?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Rest mass should be considered a pleonasm. $\endgroup$ – Andrei Geanta Nov 27 '17 at 10:49
  • $\begingroup$ youtube.com/watch?v=n_yx_BrdRF8 $\endgroup$ – Andrei Geanta Nov 27 '17 at 10:59
  • $\begingroup$ Note that there is no fundamental need to group the Lorentz factor with either of the other symbols in $p = \gamma m v$, and that many author do neither. (The $\gamma v$ grouping seems to go by the name "proper velocity" though it is not consistent with the use of "proper" elsewhere in the nomenclature of relativity.) $\endgroup$ – dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten Nov 27 '17 at 21:01
3
$\begingroup$

Mass is a concept that developed with Newtonian mechanics as an invariant additive quantity. It is correctly called the inertial mass, because it comes from the F=ma identification, the constant response to acceleration.

When special relativity came at first as a proposal and then validated by innumerable data, the E=mc^2 formula gave a handle to understanding the inertial mass , i.e the response to acceleration.

This is the mass that has to be used when trying to accelerate a space ship close to velocity of light, and it was impressive enough, because together with the quantum mechanical description of nuclei ( binding energy curve) it showed a connection of mass and energy.

So in the quantum and special relativity domain, mass is not a conserved quantity, only energy and momentum are conserved.

Clarity of mathematics shows that these are a fourvector, with an invariant to lorenz transformations value when added as four vectors.Rest masses are not additive, four vectors follow vector addition rules, so a system of particles has an invariant mass the length of the added four vectors.

For individual particles it is the "rest mass", at the limit of velocity equal to zero.

The relativistic mass is variable with velocity:

relativistic mass

In particle physics the invariant/rest mass identifies one to one the particles in the elementary particles table . All other invariant masses in principle are derivable using the four vector algebra.

So we call relativistic mass the famous mass in the formula E=mc^2 as a respect for the historical development, and invariant/rest mass the four vector "lengths" to stress the special relativity equations.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Because most physicists learned special relativity in books that do use the concept of relativistic mass, in which "rest" mass and mass are different things. It will take some time for these words to vanish from vocabulary.

$\endgroup$
-1
$\begingroup$

Velocity doesn't change due to time dilation. Length contraction and time dilation ensure that velocity, length/time stays the same. As for relativistic mass, if you observe a body in motion its velocity is simply distance traversed divided by the time taken , as measured in your reference frame. Remember that your reference frame here does not experience time dilation or length contraction (those happen in the ref frame of the moving body).
The momentum of the body when measured in your reference frame however varies by the factor $\gamma$, which is due to relativistic mass.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.