0
$\begingroup$

In my lecturer's notes on Lagrangian mechanics in the chapter on normal modes they state the following:

Instead of rigid constraints, let us now consider a situation where the constraints are flexible so that the particles can move around their equilibrium positions. We assume that the system is described by $N$ generalised coordinates $q_i$. We also assume that it is natural, which means that the kinetic energy is a quadratic homogeneous function of the generalised velocities. We can write this as $$T = \frac{1}{2}\sum_{ij}a_{}(q_1, \ldots,q_N)\dot{q_i}\dot{q_j},$$ where the coefficients a_{ij} can depend on the coordinates $q_i$ but not on velocities $\dot{q_i}$. They can be chosen to be symmetric $(a_{ji}=a_{ij})$ without any loss of generality.

I am curious about two things here:

1) How can we just assume this form of the kinetic energy, what is the basis of this assumption? If I were to look at this subject myself with no notes, I would hardly just come up with this form.

2) $a_{ij}$ can be "chosen" to be symmetric, is this not necessary true from the commutative property of multiplication?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Non-canonical Lagrangians (Lagrangians with non-quadratic kinetic term) arise in some applications such as plasma physics. Quadratics usually imply small perturbations from equilibrium; i.e., something like Hooke's law. Here is an example of non-symmetric kinetic energy: https://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.4773440.

If A and B are symmetric then AB is symmetric iff A and B commute.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.