1
$\begingroup$

Suppose we apply a tensile/compressive stress of, say, 2 atm on a metal rod. If we consider a metal as consisting of electronic and lattice subsystems, could we say the the pressure of the conduction electrons (i.e. the electronic subsystem) is also 2 atm? If not, what is the pressure of the electronic subsystem and what determines that?

I guess that if there is such thing as pressure of conduction electrons it is something different from lattice stress.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Stress is a tensor quantity, pressure is a scalar quantity. For non-hydrostatic conditions, pressure is sometimes defined as one third of the trace of the stress tensor (http://www.geol.umd.edu/~candela/press.html). If your metal rod is under tensile/compressive stress, these are not hydrostatic conditions.

The electronic system, say, in metals, is degenerate at room temperature. Its pressure depends on the density (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_degeneracy_pressure).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. The relation for "electron degeneracy pressure" in that wikipedia article is derived for a free electron gas, where electrostatic electron-electron and electron-ion interactions are neglected. The article also speaks of the "normal gas pressure" which "at commonly encountered densities" is "so low that it can be neglected". The relation $P=nkT$ is given for this kind of pressure, which is derived for an ideal gas. I'm wondering what happens to these two equations if we take into account the electrostatic interactions. $\endgroup$ – apadana Nov 18 '17 at 15:56
  • $\begingroup$ @Arham : The free electron gas is a pretty good model of electrons, say, in metals, in spite of the interactions (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_liquid_theory), although the explanation of this fact is quite complex. $\endgroup$ – akhmeteli Nov 18 '17 at 17:51
  • $\begingroup$ A calculation of the compressibility of the free-electron gas (or of the bulk modulus) gives approximately correct values for some of the alkali metals. This may be a bit of a coincidence, but it shows the importance of the Pauli exclusion principle. $\endgroup$ – Pieter Nov 29 '17 at 13:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.