0
$\begingroup$

The Robert-Walkerson metric is given by

$$\left ( {\rm d}s \right )^{2}=\left ( cdt \right )^{2}-R^{2}\left ( t \right )\left ( dl \right )^{2}$$

where

$$\left ( dl \right )^{2}=R^{2}\left [ \frac{\left ( dr \right )^{2}}{1-kr^{2}}+r^{2}\left ( \left ( d \theta \right )^{2}+\sin^{2} \theta\left ( d\phi \right )^{2} \right ) \right ]$$

and $R=R\left ( t \right )$ is the expansion scale factor of the Universe with respect to time and $$\left ( dl \right )^{2} =\left [ \frac{\left ( dr \right )^{2}}{1-kr^{2}}+r^{2}\left ( \left ( d \theta \right )^{2}+\sin^{2} \theta\left ( d\phi \right )^{2} \right ) \right ]$$ gives the comoving path of a say, photon, on some geometry in 3-D.

Now, for a photon travelling in a radial path towards us from $r=0$ to $r=r_{1}$ in an EDS Universe $\left ( k=0 \right )$, the FLRW metric reduces to

$$\left ( cdt \right )^{2}=R^2\left ( t \right )\left ( dl \right )^{2}$$

which further reduces to

$$r_{1}=c\int_{t_{1}}^{t_{0}}\frac{dt}{R\left ( t \right )}\equiv d_{comoving}\tag{1}$$

for $t_{1} < t_{0}$.

Here is where I fail to understand what follows. The above FLWR metric already takes into account the Expansion scale factor of the Universe giving the proper distance $d_{proper}$. Yet, from proper distance, Equation (1) gives only the comoving distance from the equation and so the proper distance is

$$d_{proper}=R\left ( t \right )d_{comoving}=R\left ( t \right )r_{1}$$

Why do we take into account the expansion scale factor twice?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

As you point out ${\rm d}l$ represents a comoving path. So you'd need to multiply it by $R$ to get physical distances. That is

$$ {\rm d}l = c\frac{{\rm d}t}{R(t)} ~~\Rightarrow~~~ l_1 -\underbrace{l_0}_{=0} = \int_{t_0}^{t_1}c\frac{{\rm d}t}{R(t)} $$

such that $R(t_1)l_1 $ is the actual length in physical coordinates.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much. I think I now understand. The link en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… help a lot by mentioning about the reduced circumference $r$ where it was, otherwise, not mentioned in my notes. Since dr would then be the differential reduced circumference which is really just a comoving distance, multiplying it by the expansion scale factor of the Universe converts this to its respective proper distance. $\endgroup$ – Physkid Nov 13 '17 at 4:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.