2
$\begingroup$

The generalized uncertainty principle can be written as (where A and B are observables): $$ \sigma_A\sigma_B \geq \left| \frac{1}{2i}\langle [A,B]\rangle_\Psi \right| $$ But the average value of the commutator depends on $\Psi$, the state of the particle in question. Hence is it right to say that for some states the observables A and B will have to respect the uncertainty relation and in some other cases it won't? I guess it depends on the shape of the commutator so when can we be sure that the average value will be null even if the commutator itself is non-null? Or when can we be sure that the average value won't be null?

I thought that one case where this principle won't depend on the state is when the commutator $[A,B] = \alpha I$ where $I$ is the identity matrix as it commutes with any state. And thus, $\langle [A,B]\rangle = \langle\Psi \mid [A,B]\mid\Psi\rangle = \alpha \langle \Psi\mid\Psi\rangle= \alpha. $

Are there any other cases where the uncertainty principle is independent of the state?

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

In general the uncertainty inequality does depend on the state $\Psi$, i.e . the bound on the right hand side changes with $\Psi$. However, for any $\Psi$, the inequality is always respected so the product of uncertainty of observables always satisfies the bound, provided the observables are self-adjoint and the state $\Psi$ is normalizable. These last two conditions are more or less implicit (sometimes more than less) in the derivation.

In general, the bound will not depend on $\Psi$ when the commutator is diagonal and thus proportional to the unit operator, as you suggest.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Is there any other cases where the lower limit of the Heisenberg Inequality won't depend on the state? $\endgroup$
    – E. Morell
    Nov 10, 2017 at 1:20
  • $\begingroup$ @E.Morell If the commutator is $0$ but this is a trivial case. I don’t know of any other but I would not be surprised to learn there are lesser known examples. $\endgroup$ Nov 10, 2017 at 1:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.