3
$\begingroup$

Question:

The angular position at which first minima is observed is $\theta=\pi/6$ rad for a slit of width $e$ and light of wavelength $\lambda$. The angular position at which secondary maximum is observed is = ?

My attempt:

For first minima, $e\sin\theta=\lambda...(i)$ Unfortunately, formula for maxima is not given in my book so I derived it on my own:

For deriving second maxima
Consider $2N$ wavelets all throughout the slit.
Path difference between the $i$-th wavelet and $(N+i)$-th wavelet ($i\in [1,N]$) should be $\lambda$ for constructive interference.
So, if maxima occurs at $\theta'$ angular position, $\frac{e}{2}\sin\theta'=\lambda$ or $e\sin\theta'=2\lambda...(ii)$

Dividing (i) by (ii), we get:

$$\frac{\sin\theta}{\sin\theta'}=\frac{1}{2}$$ $$\Rightarrow \sin\theta'=2\sin\theta=1$$ $$\Rightarrow \theta'=\pi/2$$

which is the wrong answer -_-

My question:

Please explain my mistake and suggest correct approach.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Sorry for writing another answer. It appears to be to long for a comment.

Eq. $(ii)$ you wrote (in my notation) is $$\frac{u}{\pi} = \frac{e \sin \theta'}{\lambda} = 2.0$$ which turns out to be a minimum. $i$-th and $(N+i)$-th interfere constructively but then consider what happens when you superpose all the (already paired) $1,2,3, \cdots, N $ waves. The $N$-th wave is $\lambda$ behind $1$st. Therefore you have a resultant wave proportional to $$ \sum_{j=0}^{N-1} e^{2\pi i \cdot \frac{j}{N-1}}$$ which is a geometric series and evaluates to 0. Pairing many wavelets is useful for determining minima. There might be a another savvy way to determine maxima angles but I'm not aware of it. Edit: Here's the illustration using rotating vectors. Each vector has a length proportional to the amplitude of the wavelet and phase as a polar angle.

N = 18 illustration

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ "what happens when you superpose all the (already paired) 1,2,3,⋯,N1,2,3,⋯,N waves. " Yes, that's a valid reason. I don't understand the vector well, but anyway. maybe i'll understand it later. Thanks! $\endgroup$ – Gaurang Tandon Nov 3 '17 at 13:14
0
$\begingroup$

The full intensity (as a function of $\theta$) is given by $$ I(\theta) = \left( \frac{\sin{u}}{u} \right)^2 $$ where $ u = \frac{\pi}{\lambda}e \sin{\theta}$. You can work this out using Fraunhofer diffraction or the method of rotating vectors. Notice that the angle $\theta = \frac{\pi}{6}$ isn't 'small'. Hint: function $x \mapsto \frac{\sin x}{x}$ has maxima for $\frac{x}{\pi} = \pm 1.4303, \pm 2.4590$ etc.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for helping! But a) this formula isn't given in my textbook, so I suppose there might be another method to this question b) you didn't still explain why my method was wrong. $\endgroup$ – Gaurang Tandon Oct 29 '17 at 1:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.