I am struggling with trying to solve the following problem, attempting just (a) and the first part of (b) for this exercise:
During a reversible adiabatic volume change of an ideal gas, $PV^{\gamma}$ remains constant, where $\gamma$ is the ration of the heat capacity at constant volume to that at constant pressure. i.e. $\gamma = C_P/C_V$. One mole of an ideal gas, initially at $300^{\circ}K$ and atmospheric pressure, is compressed to half it's initial volume.
(a) Derive a general expression for the work done on the gas in terms of the starting and finishing volumes and other necessary variables. Remember that you'll need to find an expression for $P$ as a function of $V$, and that this expression will involve $P_1$ and $V_1$.
(b) Use yor expression to calculate the amount of work done for a monatomic ideal gas and (b) a diatomic gas, in which the vibrational motion is completely frozen out.
Here's my initial thought process:
- This is an adiabatic process, so $PV^{\gamma} = K$ where $K$ is a constant.
- This gas is monatomic, so $\gamma = 1 + 2/3$.
- We are not given a volume, but given a pressure and temperature, which means the volume can be deduced from the ideal gas law.
- This is an adiabatic volume change, so the work can be found given the following integral:
$$W = - \int_{V_1}^{V_2} PdV$$
- Since $V_2 = 1/2 V_1$, we can replace that for $V_2$, and note $P=\frac{K}{V^\gamma}$. Thus we want to solve:
$$W = - K\int_{V_1}^{0.5V_1} \frac{dV}{V^\gamma}$$
This should reduce to the following equation:
$$W = -K \left(\frac{0.5V_1^{1-\gamma} - V_1^{1-\gamma}}{1-\gamma}\right)$$
With $V_1 = \frac{nRT}{P}$ with $P = 101325 \ Pa$, $T = 300 \ K$, and $n = 1$ mole, $V = 0.0246 m^3$. This renders $V_2 = 0.0123 m^3$. $K = PV^{\gamma}, \therefore K = 210.83$.
After throwing that mess into a calculator, my final value is $1869.405\ J$ roughly.
Some questions of mine:
Why can we not use $P = \frac{nRT}{V}$ as our function of $V$ for the integral instead of $P=\frac{K}{V^\gamma}$?
My answer should not be negative, which should be due to $0.5 V_1 - V_1 = -0.5 V_1$, but I don't see how that logic was wrong. What's the problem there?
Did I do anything laughably wrong here, and if so, where? I feel like I did something wrong.