The Wikipedia article on photoelectric effect has the following line:

Electrons can absorb energy from photons when irradiated, but they usually follow an "all or nothing" principle. All of the energy from one photon must be absorbed and used to liberate one electron from atomic binding, or else the energy is re-emitted. If the photon energy is absorbed, some of the energy liberates the electron from the atom, and the rest contributes to the electron's kinetic energy as a free particle.

Now, the Wikipedia entry uses the word "usually" rather than "always", so are there any cases where this "all or nothing" principle is not followed?

PS: exclude the case in which an orbit transfer may occur.

  • $\begingroup$ Raman scattering is one. $\endgroup$ – Jon Custer Oct 25 '17 at 14:22

Compton scattering can be considered as a clear counter-example: a photon of reduced energy is in the final state, along with an electron of increased kinetic energy.

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ In the terminology of gamma-rayspectroscopy, Compton scattering and photoelectric effects are clearly differentiated, as can be seen e.g. in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_spectroscopy#Detector . So in this language, the Compton process is not a subset of the photoelectric effect. $\endgroup$ – Ezze Oct 7 '19 at 12:20

What you are looking for is the two photon photoelectric effect. In this case, the electron absorbs (part of) the energies of two photons, and gets ejected. Now it is very important to understand the work function of the electron. This is the minimum thermodynamic work to remove an electron from the solid lattice.

The photoelectric work function is the minimum photon energy required to liberate an electron from a substance, in the photoelectric effect. If the photon's energy is greater than the substance's work function, photoelectric emission occurs and the electron is liberated from the surface. Excess photon energy results in a liberated electron with non-zero kinetic energy.

Now you are asking what happens when all of the energy of one photon is absorbed by one electron, but the electron is still not ejected, even though the photon's energy is above the work function. Or you are asking what happens when only part of the photon's energy is enough to eject the electron.

There are a few cases:

  1. this is QM, all about probabilities, and thought the photon's energy is above the work function of the electron, the electron is still not ejected. In this case part of the photon's energy is transferred to the molecule's vibrational and rotational energies (heating up the material)

  2. two photon absorption, where a single electron absorbs two photon's energy (in part), and gets ejected (because even part of the two photon's energy is above the work function)

Two-photon absorption (TPA) is the absorption of two photons of identical or different frequencies in order to excite a molecule from one state (usually the ground state) to a higher energy, most commonly an excited electronic state.


We report on the observation of two-photon electron emission from silver nanoparticles suspended in nitrogen flow resulting from irradiating them with continuous wave and pulsed laser light with photon energies below the threshold of the single-photon photoelectric effect. The photoelectron yield is quadratic in the light intensity, and the two-photon electron emission threshold is evident. The efficiency of the two-photon photoelectric effect is determined for nanoparticles of various sizes. These experiments offer the net information on nonlinear quantum properties of an isolated single nanoparticle which is crucial for developing theoretical models.


| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Why the downvote? $\endgroup$ – Árpád Szendrei Nov 16 '19 at 21:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.