1
$\begingroup$

I have a question regarding the rotation of spinors in a spin-1/2 system.

We have a Spin generator $\hat{S}$ for rotations of spinors. A rotation around the axis $\vec{n}$ with the angle $\phi$ is generated by the operator:

$$ D_{\vec{n}}(\phi) = \exp(-i\phi \hat{S}\cdot \vec{n}) $$

This operator can also be written, for a rotation about $z$ e.g. as:

$$D_z(\phi) = \cos\left(\frac{\phi}{2}\right) - i \sigma_z \sin\left(\frac{\phi}{2}\right) $$

Here, $\hat{S}_i = \sigma_i/2$ and $\sigma_i$ are the pauli matrices.

$\sigma_1 = \begin{bmatrix}0 & 1 \\ 1& 0 \end{bmatrix}$ $\sigma_2 = \begin{bmatrix}0&-i\\ i&0\end{bmatrix}$ and $\sigma_3 = \begin{bmatrix} 1&0\\ 0&-1\end{bmatrix}$

Then we have given two states with a spin into the direction of the z-axis:

$\vert S_z= + \frac{1}{2} \rangle = \begin{bmatrix}1\\ 0\end{bmatrix} = \vert {\uparrow}\rangle $

and

$\vert S_z = - \frac{1}{2} \rangle = \begin{bmatrix}0\\ 1\end{bmatrix} = \vert {\downarrow}\rangle $

Now my question is:

With which rotation $D_\vec{n}(\phi)$ can the eigenstate $\vert S_x = +\frac{1}{2}\rangle$ be obtained using $\vert\uparrow\rangle $?

How can I calculate that?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

The simplest way to think about it is by thinking of spin as a classical vector.

What kind of rotation would take a vector completely along $\hat z$ to the $\hat x$ axis? Clearly, this would be a rotation in the $xz$ plane, i.e. a rotation about $\hat y$.

The same argument will work for spin. You might care to reflect on the relation between the classical angle and the angle of rotation in spin space, remembering that $\vert +\rangle$ and $\vert -\rangle$ are orthogonal vector in spin space but antiparallel in ordinary space. That’s why $\phi$ is mutiplied by $1/2$ in your expressions.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much! Now I have the following result: $D_y |\uparrow> = cos(\phi / 2) - i \begin{bmatrix}0 & -i\\ i & 0\end{bmatrix} sin(\phi /2) |\phi> = cos(\phi / 2) - \begin{bmatrix}0 & 1\\ -1 & 0\end{bmatrix} sin(\phi / 2) |\uparrow>$ And how do I now show, that this is $|S_x = +1/2>$? $\endgroup$ – Armani42 Oct 21 '17 at 12:55
  • $\begingroup$ @Armani42 You want to be sure that the $\cos(\phi/2)$ term is multiplied by the unit matrix matrix. There remains for you to find the eigenstates of $S_x$ as combinations of eigenstates of $S_z$, and find the angle $\phi$ that will produce these eigenstates. Can you guess $\phi$ from classical arguments? $\endgroup$ – ZeroTheHero Oct 21 '17 at 12:58
  • $\begingroup$ Oh okay, and the Angle is than because spins rotate half as fast: $\phi$= $\pi$ ? $\endgroup$ – Armani42 Oct 21 '17 at 13:01
  • $\begingroup$ @Armani42 why do you try it and see if the result is an eigenstate of $S_x$? $\endgroup$ – ZeroTheHero Oct 21 '17 at 13:02
  • $\begingroup$ Okay now I tried and I get: $D_y |\uparrow> = \begin{bmatrix} cos(\phi/2) & -sin(\phi/2) \\ sin(\phi/2) & cos(\phi/2)\end{bmatrix} |\uparrow>$ And $D_y(\pi) = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & -1 \\ 1 & 0\end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 0\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}0 \\ 1\end{bmatrix}$ But I can't take an eigenvalue of that :/ $\endgroup$ – Armani42 Oct 21 '17 at 13:09
0
$\begingroup$

When you rotate spin operators i.e. $$D_{\vec{n}}(\phi) \cdot (\hat{S} \cdot \vec{m}) \cdot D^{\dagger}_{\vec{n}}(\phi),$$ it is the same as if you would rotate (right-hand) the vector $\vec{m}$ around the vector $\vec{n}$ at angle $\phi$. It is a consequence of algebraic properties of spin operators (they span $su(2)$ Lie algebra). Following this analogy, $\hat{S}_{x,y,z}$ can be pictured as three orthogonal versors of the 3D Euclidean space. If you rotate versor $e_{x}$ at angle $\phi = -\pi/2$ around $e_y$ you will get $e_z$. So, in terms of spin operators: $$\hat{S}_z = e^{i\frac{\pi}{2}\hat{S}_y} \cdot \hat{S}_x \cdot e^{-i\frac{\pi}{2}\hat{S}_y}.$$

Now your initial state is an eigenstate of $\hat{S}_z$ i.e. $$\hat{S}_z |s_z=+1/2\rangle = \frac{1}{2} |s_z=+1/2\rangle.$$ If you use previous relation you can write $$\hat{S}_x e^{-i\frac{\pi}{2}\hat{S}_y}|s_z=+1/2\rangle = \frac{1}{2} e^{-i\frac{\pi}{2}\hat{S}_y}|s_z=+1/2\rangle,$$ and according to definition of eigenstate $$|s_x=+1/2\rangle := e^{-i\frac{\pi}{2}\hat{S}_y}|s_z=+1/2\rangle$$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.