This question already has an answer here:
In the recent neutron star merger. The gravitational waves started 100 seconds before the collision, which is when they reached a max and STOPPED. The mass quadrupole had stopped changing, which means the objects had physically collided. Only being 10 km in diameter or so. THEN it took 1.7 more seconds for the first gammas from that collision to arrive. Fishy. Where could gamma rays hang out that long?
Tell me why we are not looking at direct evidence that light is slower than gravitational waves by 2.5 parts per trillion = 2.7 seconds over 130 million light years.
So far as I can tell, nothing requires gravitational waves to travel at EXACTLY the speed of light. They only have do so approximately. There’s universal maximum information speed in SR, but it can just as well be the speed of gravitational waves, and doesn’t have to be exactly c, so long as it’s very close to it. Would we know if Gauss’ law is off by a factor of 1 in a trillion? Suppose photons had a very very tiny rest mass, far smaller than neutrinos. Would there be physical consequences? The range of electric fields would look the nearly the same at those differences. So would the rest of physics.
Einstein’s derivation of the speed of g-waves has two problems. One is that it is in the weak field limit. It might not be applicable to gravitational waves so strong we can detect them from 130 million light years away. These are STRONG gravitational waves.
Even worse, Einstein also makes standard assumptions in his g-wave speed derivation, one of them being explicitly that "c," the maximum velocity in GR from the GR field equation, IS the speed of light. Maybe it's just "c"-- the maximal speed in space time. If you put that c is the speed of electromagnetic radiation in as an assumption, you’ll get that out as an answer. Garbage in, garbage out = GIGO. In fact we may be looking at GIGO from LIGO. ;'p