I thought the coupling constants were something like:

$\alpha \approx 1/137$

$\alpha_w \approx 10^{-6}$

$\alpha_s \approx 1$

And yet if you look at any pictorial representation of the running of the couplings you see something like this (or try google):

running couplings

which seems to indicate that (at the energies scales we have access to) $\alpha$ is less than $\alpha_w$. Why is the ordering of the size of the couplings messed up in all of these pictures?

  • $\begingroup$ The plots that you are seeing and asking about are plotting the inverse of $\alpha's$. So, nothing is messed up. The larger will become smaller, and the smaller will become larger when you take the inverse of things. $\endgroup$ – stupidity Sep 13 '12 at 14:45
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, of course the inverse is plotted. That explains why the strong coupling is on the bottom. But why is $\alpha_w$ in the middle and not on the top? $\endgroup$ – user1247 Sep 13 '12 at 14:57

I think you're confusing the weak structure constant with the Fermi constant. The Fermi constant is $G_F=1.166\times 10^{-5}\text{ GeV}^{-2}$ and it gives us the effective strength of the four-point interaction of fermions. This four-point interaction is of course mediated by the W boson and by looking at the relevant tree-level Feynman diagrams we have $$\frac{G_F}{\sqrt{2}}=\frac{g_W^2}{8M_W^2},$$ where $g_W$ is the weak coupling and $M_W=80.4\text{ GeV}$ the mass of the W boson. Plugging in numbers, we find $$\alpha_W=\frac{g_W^2}{4\pi}\approx\frac{1}{30}.$$

  • $\begingroup$ What is the weak coupling $g_W$ then? $\endgroup$ – user1247 Sep 13 '12 at 15:13
  • $\begingroup$ Why is this analysis wrong (this is where I got my numbers): hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/forces/couple.html $\endgroup$ – user1247 Sep 13 '12 at 15:17
  • $\begingroup$ They assume that the interaction that causes the decay is the Fermi interaction, with coupling $G_F/\sqrt{2}$. In the UV completion of the Fermi theory, i.e. the weak interaction, this coupling corresponds to $g_W^2/8M_W^2$. $\endgroup$ – AndyS Sep 13 '12 at 17:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.