0
$\begingroup$

I have the solution to problem 2.1 from Bergersen's and Plischke's textbook which I don't quite understand.

I'll post the question itself and its solution.

a) Consider a harmonic oscillator with Hamiltonian $H = 1/2(p^2+q^2)$ show that any phase space trajectory $x(t)$ with energy $E$, on the average, spend equal time in all regions of the constant energy surface $\Gamma(E)$.

b) Consider two linearly coupled harmonic oscillator: $$H=1/2(p_1^2+p_2^2+q_1^2+q_2^2+q_1q_2)$$Express the phase space trajectory $x=(p_1,p_2,q_1,q_2)$ in terms of the initial values of the amplitude and phase of the normal coordinates. Show that there are regions of the constant energy surface which aren't visitedfor any particular trajectory $x(t)$.

Now, for the solution:

a) Let $$p=r\cos \phi ; q=r\sin \phi$$ The constant energy surface $\Gamma(E)$ in the $q-p$ plane is the circle $r=const$. The equations of motion can be written $\dot{r}=0 ; \dot{\phi}=const$, i.e., the phase space point moves with constant velocity and covers the whole "surface". It thus spends equal time in all regions of $\Gamma(E)$.

b) The solutions to the equations of motion can be written $$q_1=r_1\sin \phi_1 + r_2 \sin \phi_2$$ $$ q_2 = r_1\sin\phi_1 - r_2\sin\phi_2$$ where $r_1,r_2$ are constants of the motion and $$\phi_1 = \sqrt{3/2}t + \phi_1(0)$$ $$\phi_2 = \sqrt{1/2}t + \phi_2(0)$$ The projection of the constant energy surface on the $r_1,r_2$ surface is the ellipse $$3/4 r_1^2+1/4 r_2^2=const$$ However, with given initial conditions only a single point on this ellipse is visited.

I don't understand the solution to part b), I assume that $p_i = r_i \cos \phi_i$, and then to derive $3/4 r_1^2+1/4 r_2^2=const$ I need to use the Hamiltonian given in b) and then equate what I get to some constant, but I get if I am not mistaken the following:

$$1/2(r_1^2+2r_1^2\sin^2 \phi_1 + r_2^2) = constant$$

Which is off by far, what do I need in order to derive this ellipse equation, I don't see how did they derive it out of thin air.

Any answers?

Thanks.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

In general, imagine you have a Hamiltonian of the form

$$ H = \sum_i \frac{p_i^2}{2} + \sum_{i,j}q_iO_{ij}q_j \tag{1} $$

where ${\bf O}$ is a positive definite symmetric matrix, you can diagonalize ${\bf O} = {\bf U}\Omega{\bf U}^{t}$, where $\Omega = {\rm diag} (\omega_1^2, \omega_2^2\cdots)$ and define

$$ q_i' = \sum_j U_{ij}q_j , ~~~~p_i' = \sum_jU_{ij}p_j \tag{2} $$

you can check that in this coordinates, the Hamiltonian (1) becomes

$$ H = \sum_{i}\frac{p_i'^2}{2} + \sum_{i}\omega_i^2q_i'^2 \tag{3} $$

That is, a set of uncoupled harmonic oscillators, each with solution of the form

$$ q_i'(t) = r_i\sin(\omega_it + \phi_i) \tag{4} $$

In you case, the matrix ${\bf O}$ is simply

$$ {\bf O} = \left(\begin{matrix} 1 & 1/2 \\ 1/2 & 1\end{matrix}\right) \tag{5} $$

which can be diagonalized with

$$ {\bf U} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\begin{matrix} 1 & -1 \\ 1 & 1\end{matrix}\right) ~~~ \Omega = \left(\begin{matrix} 3/2 & 0 \\ 0 & 1/2\end{matrix}\right) \tag{6} $$

Can you take it from here?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I guess what was missing or not mentioned here is that $p=\dot{q}$, in which case we get: $p_i' = \omega_i r_i\cos(\omega_i t+\phi_i(0))$. $\endgroup$ – MathematicalPhysicist Oct 11 '17 at 22:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.