4
$\begingroup$

The gross mass of a satellite rocket is tiny compared to that of Earth, and Luna. Between them, however, the two bodies set up tides in bodies of water which itself is again considerable mass.

At the point of launch a satellite rocket might not be affected by the Moon's gravitation attraction. As it goes higher/ more distant from earth/closer to escape/ target orbit do it's fuel burn statistics change depending upon the position of the moon vis-a-vis launch location/payload release location?

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

No, there is no change to the fuel burn statistics due to the Moon. An intuitive answer to this would be that if there were some change, such as a decrease in fuel consumption when the moon is overhead, then NASA/ESA/etc would always be waiting for the moon to be overhead before launching. Since they don't do this, it is safe to say there is no difference.

A more scientific answer would be that the Moon does not have enough influence over a satellite to affect it in any significant way.

Let us perform an analysis. Satellites normally don't go any closer to the Moon than geosynchronous orbit - about $42000~km$ in radius. Let's take a $17000~kg$ satellite nearing this altitude and say that the Moon is directly overhead. Then, on average the satellite would be $342000~km$ from the center of gravity of the Moon, which would mean it experiences a net force due to the Moon of around $6N$. This means an acceleration of $3.5*10^{-4} m/s^2$ towards the Moon. Again, this means that in the course of an hour, the Moon could add a maximum of around $1.3 m/s$ to the satellite's velocity. Given that a satellite at that orbit has a velocity around $3km/s$ and that lower satellites have faster speeds, it is safe to say that the Moon does not contribute in any significant way to changing the velocity during the launch/orbital insertion phases and as such, does not change the fuel statistics of launching a satellite.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Not going to downvote, but this answer is wrong in two regards. One is that this answer grossly overstates the magnitude of the affect of the Moon during the short timeframe of a launch. You should be looking at the tidal acceleration, which is orders of magnitude smaller. The other is that despite this, NASA/ESA/etc do model the effects of the Moon during launch, at least in simulations that cover launch and the hours / days that follow launch. $\endgroup$ – David Hammen Dec 17 '16 at 5:09
  • $\begingroup$ The reason is that failing to model the gravitational influences of the Moon and the Sun in the hours/days after launch can result in significant errors. It's easier to just model those effects from the start rather than enabling them at some point in time post-launch. That said, launch vehicles' flight software typical do not model those third body effects. Launch vehicles typically turn over control to some other part of the spacecraft shortly after launch. $\endgroup$ – David Hammen Dec 17 '16 at 5:10
  • $\begingroup$ @DavidHammen Go ahead and downvote if you want. This is from over 3 years ago. I refined my physics quite a bit in the interim. If it's wrong, then it isn't alone as an answer of mine that's wrong but can't be deleted because it's accepted $\endgroup$ – Jim Jan 2 '17 at 19:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.