There is something I would like to clarify with gauge fixing.

In E.M, we can introduce the potential vector.

As $div(\vec{B})=0$ we know that we can write $\vec{B}=\vec{curl}(\vec{A})$.

But as $\vec{curl}(\vec{grad})=0$, we have the fact that $A$ is defined at a gradient.

Thus : $\vec{A}=\vec{A_0}+\vec{grad}(\phi)$ describes the same $B$ field and thus the same physics.

To uniquely define $\vec{A}$ we can do gauge fixing. It means that we will add an equation on $A$ that will fix the potential $\phi$.

For example we have Coulomb gauge that is : $div(\vec{A})=0$.

But what I don't understand is : how do we know that fixing the divergence of $A$ will not change its curl ?


In your example of the Coulomb gauge, the gauge condition $$\nabla\cdot({\bf A}+\nabla\phi)=0 $$ can be viewed as an equation for $\phi$ which picks out a specific $\phi$ field from an infinite number of possibilities before the choice of gauge. In other words, $\nabla\cdot A=0$ is an additional condition on top of the requirement physical observable (the curl of $A$) should be remain unchanged.

  • $\begingroup$ I have a little question in link with this remark. Lets assume i want $div(A)=0$. In my book they say it implicates that $\Delta \phi=0$ but for me if we choose to work with $A_2=A_1+grad(\phi)$ it would mean that $\Delta \phi=-A_1$ where $A_1$ is the "old" vector potential. Could you help me to clarify this ? I hope you see what I misunderstand $\endgroup$ – StarBucK Sep 27 '17 at 21:43
  • $\begingroup$ @StarBucK, if $\nabla \cdot \vec A_1 \ne 0$ but $\nabla \cdot \vec A_2 = 0$ then it follows that $\nabla \cdot \nabla\phi = - \nabla\cdot\vec A_1$. $\endgroup$ – Alfred Centauri Sep 27 '17 at 23:29
  • $\begingroup$ @StarBuck It is always difficult to guess with limited information :) My guess is the following. If you employ Coulomb gauge, $\nabla \cdot A=0$, and you want to introduce a scalar field $\phi$ so that $A\rightarrow A+\nabla\phi$ does not break the gauge, then you find $\Delta\phi=0$. In other words, you still have some extra freedom even after you adopt Coulomb gauge. $\endgroup$ – gamebm Sep 28 '17 at 0:16
  • $\begingroup$ @starbuck You're likely to be misreading your text - read it again, carefully. And, in any case, provide a full reference. $\endgroup$ – Emilio Pisanty Sep 28 '17 at 4:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.