1
$\begingroup$

$$K_{\mathrm {translational}}= \frac{1}{2} Mv_{\mathrm {com}}^2$$

Why does the term for translational kinetic energy include only the velocity of the centre of mass of a rigid body? How can we ignore the velocity of the different particles constituting the system?

Can someone prove this to me? I tried finding it on net but couldn't as at most places there was derivation of translational $K$ for ideal gases given.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Isn't this just a matter of definition? By labelling $K$ as translational you are specifying that it is only the energy of the COM. The energy of motion of the components of your system would be counted as internal energy or heat. $\endgroup$ – John Rennie Sep 25 '17 at 16:28
  • $\begingroup$ But @JohnRennie the individual particles have velocity too...Also specifying $\equiv$ defining. $\endgroup$ – Archer Sep 25 '17 at 16:29
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, and we call that internal energy or heat. So total energy is the kinetic energy plus the internal energy. It isn't that we ignore the energy of the individual particles, just that we call it something else. $\endgroup$ – John Rennie Sep 25 '17 at 16:29
  • $\begingroup$ What would be the formula for that @JohnRennie ? And I strongly feel that the formula should include velocity. $\endgroup$ – Archer Sep 25 '17 at 16:30
  • $\begingroup$ We should take this to the chat $\endgroup$ – John Rennie Sep 25 '17 at 16:30
1
$\begingroup$

The notion of 'translational' and 'rotational' kinetic energy comes by starting from the kinetic energy of a point particle (which is only translational), and building up a notion of the properties of systems of particles.

It turns out that the energy factors into a portion that has the $\frac{1}{2}Mv_\text{com}^2$ form (where $M$ is the total mass and $v_\text{com}$ is the velocity of the center of mass) and a portion due to motion of the parts relative the center of mass (which for a rigid body is the rotational kinetic energy).

This development is purely algebraic so you might be able to work it yourself with no more hint than I've given you, but it is also shown in every serious mechanics book.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.