# When I pull a rope attached to a block, does the rope OR the block pull me back? If so, with what force?

I am having a hard time understanding the tension force, especially when thinking about it at a molecular level.

Suppose I have a rope attached to a block which is sitting on frictionless surface. When I pull the rope, the molecular bonds in the rope get stretched. As a result, they try to restore (go back to "normal" position). Does this restoration pull me back or does it pull the other molecular bonds in the rope all the way to the block, until it pulls the block? or both. If the rope does pull me back, it can't be with the same force I pulled it, right? Otherwise the block would not move at all. Also, if the rope pulls the block, does the block pull the rope back too?

Is it fair to say: The person pulls the rope to the right, and the rope pulls the person to the left. The rope pulls the block to the right and the block pulls the rope to the left.

Can anyone help me understand that?

• It is completely fair and correct to state things as you did in you summary. Commented Sep 20, 2017 at 2:01
• "The person pulls the rope to the right, and the rope pulls the person to the left. " correct Commented Sep 20, 2017 at 2:20
• So if the rope pulls back the person, does it pull back with how much of a force? Also, suppose I shove someone, Why don't I get shoved back with the same force? Commented Sep 20, 2017 at 2:33
• This is exactly what Newton's Third Law is talking about. Commented Sep 20, 2017 at 3:42
• Possible duplicate of With Newton's third law, why are things capable of moving? Commented Sep 21, 2017 at 11:01

It may be easier to think of a stretched spring than a rope. A spring pulls its ends together. If you are attached to one end of the spring, and a block is attached to the other, you will be pulled towards each other. The same force is exerted by each end of the spring.

Suppose you had three identical springs identically stretched. One connects you to a wall, then second connects you to a block, and the third the block to a wall. Two identical springs pull you in opposite directions. The forces cancel. The overall effect is the same as if no forces were acting on you.

You can think of a spring as many short springs connected together. Each connection between short springs is pulled equally left and right.

If you have two identical blocks at the end of a spring on a frictionless surface, the forces on the blocks will accelerate them toward each other with identical accelerations.

If you and a block are attached to the spring, you will be pulled toward each other with equal force. Since the block is smaller than you are, the block will have a larger acceleration.

• Indeed, it's much easier to think of it as a spring instead of a rope, Thanks! Commented Sep 20, 2017 at 5:44
• @PabloMello, remember to upvote answers you consider useful. Commented Sep 21, 2017 at 12:16
• @PabloMello, a rope is a spring. It's just not a very good one as compared to a long coil spring made of hardened steel. Commented Sep 21, 2017 at 15:36

The force is equal and opposite according to good old Newton's 3rd law.You see if you pull the rope and rope pulls you back, there is no problem as the two forces are being applied on different objects. Since your mass is a lot greater than the rope you don't feel the pull a.k.a. the acceleration. Instead of rope, if you pulled a big rock, the rock wouldn't move, rather you would feel a pull towards the rock. In daily life you may miss that pull of rock. But suppose you are standing on a surface with very low coefficient of friction and the rock is on a surface of greater friction. Now if you pull the rock, you will move towards the rock. It is a simple experiment you can do on your own.

So, you are pulling the rope and the rope is pulling you back. A similar thing occurs during a falling object. The object pulls the Earth with the exact same force as the Earth's pull to the object. But only the object moves due to its low mass compared to Earth.