1
$\begingroup$

Eq. (27) in http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.2662 says I can construct the Weyl spinor according to

$$\Psi_{ABCD} = \frac 14 C{}_{\mu\nu\lambda\rho} \left( \sigma^\mu \right){}_A{}^{\dot A} \left( \sigma^\nu \right){}_{B\dot A}\left( \sigma^\lambda \right){}_C{}^{\dot C}\left( \sigma^\rho \right){}_{D\dot C}\tag{27}$$

I understand that the partial contraction in the two index pairs $\mu\leftrightarrow\nu$ and $\lambda\leftrightarrow\rho$ induces a unique way to extract either two left-handed or two right-handed spinor indices. Moreover, the above spinor is completely symmetrical, $\Psi{}_{ABCD} = \Psi{}_{(ABCD)}$ as it must to encompass all ten components of the Weyl tensor.

But why does the above work?

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

I figured it out. Multiplying

$C{}_{ABCD\dot A\dot B\dot C\dot D} = C{}_{\mu\nu\lambda\rho}\left(\sigma{}^\mu\right){}_{A\dot A} \left(\sigma{}^\nu\right){}_{B\dot B}\left(\sigma{}^\lambda\right){}_{C\dot C}\left(\sigma{}^\rho\right){}_{D\dot D} = \Psi{}_{ABCD}\epsilon{}_{\dot A\dot B} \epsilon{}_{\dot C \dot D} + \Psi{}_{\dot A\dot B\dot C\dot D}\epsilon{}_{AB}\epsilon{}_{CD}$

on both sides with $\epsilon{}^{\dot A\dot B}\epsilon{}^{\dot C\dot D}$ and using that $\Psi{}_{\dot A\dot B\dot C\dot D} = \Psi{}_{(\dot A\dot B\dot C\dot D)}$ as well as $\epsilon{}_{\dot A\dot B}\epsilon{}^{\dot A\dot B} = 2$ gives the above result.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.