1
$\begingroup$

For $N_f$ numebr of massless quarks, we know that there are global symmetries $$ \frac{SU(N_f)_L \times SU(N_f)_R \times U(1)_V}{Z_{N_f}} $$ here $U(1)_V$ is the same as $U(1)$-Baryon number conservation. The axial $U(1)_A$ is anomalous.

Question: What would be the remained global flavor symmetries of massless quarks after gauging electromagnetic $U(1)_e$? We can take $Nf=3$ where we have 3 quarks like $u,d,s$.

[WARNING]: Notice that $U(1)_e$ is part of the vector global flavor symmetry $SU(N_f)_V$, and gauging result in the remained $SU(N_f-1)_V$ global flavor symmetry. Namely, $U(1)_e$ is part of $SU(N_f)_L \times SU(N_f)_R$. However, we note that $$SU(N_f)_L \times SU(N_f)_R \neq SU(N_f)_V \times SU(N_f)_A$$ because the left-right chiral flavor generators DO commute, but the vector and axial generators of $SU(N_f)_V$ and $SU(N_f)_A$ do NOT commute. So the answer won't be as simple as $$ \frac{SU(N_f-1)_V \times SU(N_f)_A \times U(1)_V}{Z_{N_f}} [\text{This is WRONG!}] $$

What is your answer?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ The axial generators do not close into an SU(2)_A, so that group is non-existent. Look at your current algebra. $\endgroup$
    – Cosmas Zachos
    Sep 12, 2017 at 21:28
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, I know you cannot write $SU(n)_V \times SU(m)_A$ as a group. So I am asking how to write the global symmetry group. $\endgroup$
    – ann marie cœur
    Sep 12, 2017 at 21:32
  • $\begingroup$ u and d have different charges, so cannot be in a single rep of $U(1)_e$. $\endgroup$
    – Cosmas Zachos
    Sep 12, 2017 at 21:34
  • $\begingroup$ The $U(1)$ is diagonal, but the element in $N_f=3$, you can consider a Lie algebra generator matrix proportional to $diag(2/3,-1/3,-1/3)$. It is still a $U(1)$, but not the complex $U(1)$ as $+e^{i \theta} \mathbb{I}$. I am talking about the different $U(1)$. The $SU(N)$ has no $e^{i \theta} \mathbb{I}$., only $U(N)$ has $+e^{i \theta} \mathbb{I}$ But it is already taken care carefully in my question. [What you said is not part of my question.] Thanks $\endgroup$
    – ann marie cœur
    Sep 12, 2017 at 21:40
  • $\begingroup$ I am talking about the $U(1)_e$ diagonal for $N_f=3$, you can consider a Lie algebra generator matrix proportional to $diag(2/3,-1/3,-1/3)$. $\endgroup$
    – ann marie cœur
    Sep 12, 2017 at 21:42

0

Reset to default

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.