-2
$\begingroup$

This question already has an answer here:

I push my hand into a wall... The wall pushes at my hand. That's why I don't fall through the wall. BUT what if I get a sledgehammer and smash through the wall... Now all I see is Newton's third law working up until a point where the wall can't exert a big enough force to react against the sledgehammer.

So Newton's third law isn't universal?

Edit: wait guys, you are not making sense to me. But tell me if this is wrong or right. Is it because the wall pushes back against the sledgehammer with an equal and opposite force as they interact, but when the wall breaks it's just like the hammer is going through the air? Like the wall isn't there anymore?

$\endgroup$

marked as duplicate by sammy gerbil, Yashas, Kyle Kanos, Jon Custer, Bill N Sep 13 '17 at 21:57

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • $\begingroup$ Rip my question then $\endgroup$ – Scott Simmons Sep 13 '17 at 8:07
  • $\begingroup$ The wall pushes back but doesn't have enough force to stop the hammer before the material in the wall is pulled apart and then the wall pieces fall to the floor. There are many forces acting on the hammer in addition to the wall force. The hammer does slow down because of the wall force, but it doesn't stop unless the wall has enough internal forces in all its many parts to keep it together (like a 1" steel plate wall). $\endgroup$ – Bill N Sep 13 '17 at 21:57
5
$\begingroup$

This is a common misconception when learning Netwon's law. You aren't alone!

The trick to understanding how to apply Newton's law in situations involving walls and sledgehammers is to break free of our intuition regarding how much force a sledgehammer actually exerts. Intuitively, we tend to associate the force of a strike (such as that of a sledgehammer) with its maximum force -- the force it would exert against an immovable object. A sledgehammer can exert a lot of force like this. However, our intuition leads us astray here.

What actually happens is that the sledgehammer while it is impacting the wall, is exerting less than it's maximum force. In fact, it's exerting exactly the same force as the wall is exerting on it (Newton's Third Law in action). The result of those forces is that the hammer is decelerated by the force the wall applies on it, and the wall is driven backwards by the force of the hammer applied on it. This force accelerates the wall away from the sledgehammer.

When the wall breaks, that decreases how much force the wall can apply on the hammer, and thus by the 3rd law, how much force the hammer can apply on the section of wall directly in front of the head of the hammer. This lesser force is still used to accelerate the wall and its reaction is still decelerating the hammer. Given that there is likely very little material in front of the hammer and that it has been accelerated by the hammer already (before the wall fully broke), the amount of force applied here is very small. Almost the same as if the hammer was just flying through the air.

What this does mean is that if you tossed a feather in the air and then struck it with a sledgehammer, the sledgehammer would apply a very small force to the feather, and the feather would apply an equally small force to the hammer. The result would rapidly accelerate the feather up to the speed of the hammer, and would decelerate the hammer ever so slightly.

Beyond this, another thing that may help is to remember that striking events like these are not actually instantaneous. They can take a few milliseconds to occur, and the forces can change dramatically during that time. As an example, you can see how golf balls deform during impact when hit with a golf club. I find this helpful because a lot of the confusion that can happen learning Newton's laws comes from the idea of a strike happening instantaneously. In slow motion, you can see a lot more is going on!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ You are an absolute legend sir $\endgroup$ – Scott Simmons Sep 12 '17 at 0:06
5
$\begingroup$

What do you mean it only "works up to a point"?

You are correct that once the wall fails, the force felt may be reduced. But the force pair (force from the hammer onto the wall, and the force from the wall onto the hammer) continues to have identical magnitudes. It's not the case that one force continues to increase after the failure while the other decreases.

It doesn't say that swinging hard produces high forces. Only that the forces in both directions are of the same amount.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

You apply an equal and opposite force on the wall still.

The force of the sledgehammer is greater than the "maximum force" the wall can handle and therefore exert (and this is pretty complicated and depends on material sciences and impact mechanics). Instead of stopping your hammer with equal force, it applies it's "maximum force".

This decelerates the sledgehammer; but it doesn't stop it completely. The sledgehammer can keep going through with decreased speed.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.