0
$\begingroup$

I was wondering if there was a possible way to convert lux to watts accurately if the wavelength is known.

I know that for the sun there is an approximate conversion of 0.0079W/m$^2$ per Lux using standard 555nm wavelength but I can't find or work out how to do the conversion.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Wavelength of what? A single-wavelength source like a laser? $\endgroup$ – garyp Aug 30 '17 at 18:32
  • $\begingroup$ You need the value of the luminosity function for that wavelength: are you interested in low light or well light areas? Because the luminosity function aren't the same. $\endgroup$ – user154997 Aug 30 '17 at 18:46
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @garyp the wavelength of light that has passed through a coloured filter $\endgroup$ – Terminus Est Aug 31 '17 at 13:06
1
$\begingroup$

Let's give it a try. The flux per unit of surface is given in lux as

$$\Phi = 683 \int_0^{+\infty} V(\lambda)P(\lambda)d\lambda$$

where $P(\lambda)$ is the spectral flux per unit of surface and $V(\lambda)$ is the luminosity function. The latter takes into account the perception of light by the human eye whereas the former is a property of the light source, i.e. $P(\lambda)d\lambda$ is the power emitted in the wavelength range $[\lambda, \lambda+d\lambda]$ per square meter. Your assumption of monochromaticity would amount to use a delta function for $P$. Thus denoting by $\lambda_0$ the wavelength, and by $P_0$ the power in W/m$^2$,

$$\Phi = 683 V(\lambda_0) P_0.$$

So, we just need to know the luminosity function. The standard reference is the Judd-Vos function [JV78]. Wikipedia has the curves for low light (green curve) and well light (black curve) conditions.

enter image description here

[JV78] J. J. Vos. Colorimetric and photometric properties of a 2◦ fundamental observer. Color Research & Application, 3(3):125–128, 1978.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ That has really helped, thanks! However I am confused with the dimensions- the maximum luminous efficiency of 683 has units of lm/W, the power has units of W/$m^2$, wavelength would be in meters and the luminosity function is dimensionless meaning lux would have dimensions lm/m rather than lm/$m^2$ $\endgroup$ – Terminus Est Aug 31 '17 at 13:00
  • $\begingroup$ I think you misinterpreted my last equation: $V(\lambda_0)$ means the value of the luminosity function at the wavelength $\lambda_0$, not the product of $V$ by $\lambda_0$, as your comment suggest you have interpreted my formula. Or am I missing something? $\endgroup$ – user154997 Aug 31 '17 at 13:08
  • $\begingroup$ Ah yes that makes sense, I misinterpreted. Does this mean that finding the wattage per unit area is simply a case of rearranging to P0=Φ/683V(λ0)? $\endgroup$ – Terminus Est Aug 31 '17 at 13:59
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, indeed. I forgot you asked the conversion in that direction. $\endgroup$ – user154997 Aug 31 '17 at 14:01
  • $\begingroup$ Not quite a delta function. You forgot the band width. I think it should be $\Phi = 638\,V(\lambda_0)P(\lambda_0)\Delta\lambda$ where $\lambda_0$ is the peak transmission of the filter and $\Delta\lambda$ is the passband. Assuming, of course, a narrow band filter. Note that the units of your expression are W/m${}^2$/m ... flux density per wavelength interval. $\endgroup$ – garyp Aug 31 '17 at 14:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.