The Pauli Hamiltonian is $$H= \frac{1}{2m}(\boldsymbol{\sigma}\cdot(\mathbf{p} - q \mathbf{A}))^2 + q \phi $$

For the 1-component Schrodinger equation in absence of applied field we have the Lagrangian $$\mathcal{L} = i\hbar\psi^*\dot \psi - \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\Big( \boldsymbol{\nabla}\psi^*\cdot\boldsymbol{\nabla}\psi \Big)- \psi^*V\psi $$ What is the 2-component analog of this which corresponds to the Pauli Hamiltonian?

  • $\begingroup$ This is a good question. First thing I would do is to write the whole Pauli Hamiltonian using Cartesian tensor components. Then try to fit the sigma matrices into the interaction term particle-em field written in noncovariant fashion (i.e. again with Cartesian tensor notation). $\endgroup$ – DanielC Aug 29 '17 at 13:18

Well, it is a straightforward transcription, if you appreciate the language.

For the 1-component (classical) Schroedinger field in absence of applied external EM fields, the Lagrangian density is actually $$\mathcal{L} = i\hbar\psi^*\dot \psi - \frac{1}{2m}\Big( \psi^*\boldsymbol{p}^2\psi \Big)- \psi^*V\psi ~~;$$ (I have integrated your expression, corrected, by parts and supplanted ${\boldsymbol p}=-i\hbar {\boldsymbol \nabla}$.)

The usual degenerate canonical momentum for ψ is but $\Pi_\psi=i\hbar \psi^* $, which eliminates the time derivative term in the Legendre transform to the hamiltonian, since $\psi^* \Pi_\psi-i\hbar \psi^* \partial_t\psi=0$.

The ensuing field Hamiltonian density is then also trivial, $$ {\cal H}= \psi^* \Big( \frac{1}{2m} \boldsymbol{p}^2 +V\Big) \psi, $$ netting you the standard Schroedinger hamiltonian.

To generalize to Pauli's, promote the wave-fields/functions to two-spinors, insert the requisite vector potentials (in the non-quantized classical potential part), and you have $$\mathcal{L} = i\hbar\psi^\dagger\cdot \dot \psi - \psi^\dagger \cdot \Big( \frac{1}{2m}(\boldsymbol{\sigma}\cdot(\mathbf{p} - q \mathbf{A}))^2 + q \phi \Big) \psi.$$ Recall the Pauli matrices are Hermitian. The action is the space & time integral of this.

Again, variation w.r.t. the classical two-spinor fields/variables (like the qs and ps of classical mechanics) yields the corresponding Schroedinger/Pauli equation.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.