1
$\begingroup$

I'm trying to find a relation between the energy, E, of a state and its corresponding angular momentum, $\ell$. I was under the impression it was loosely related by:

$$ E \sim (\ell (\ell+1)) \hbar $$

Does anyone have any source that can confirm this? I've searched and have found nothing.

I only ask as I'm trying to find a source that can confirm a proportional relationship between l and E for a state within a nucleus, to prove the 1p3/2 state is more energetically favourable than the 1d5/2 state. If anyone has a source would they mind linking it in a reply?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

The idea is the following. The Hamiltonian can only depend on $L^2$ (if you'd add terms like $c_x L_x + c_y L_y + c_z L_z$ you'd choose a preferential direction in space). So the simplest possible $SO(3)$-invariant Hamiltonian is

$$H = c L^2$$

for some constant $c > 0$. Next, from $SO(3)$ invariance you know that states are organized into multiplets, meaning that they are labeled as

$$|l,m \rangle$$

with $m=-l,\ldots,l$. Finally, you should remember that the Casimir $L^2$ acts on such states as

$$L^2 |l,m \rangle = l(l+1) |l,m \rangle$$

which essentially proves the relation you want to show. The coefficient $c$ depends on the microscopics of your theory and cannot be fixed by group theory alone.

More generally the Hamiltonian can be an arbitrary function $H = f(L^2)$. In particular, it's possible to have interactions like $(L^2)^2$ etc. In the field theory language, you can think of those as higher-derivative terms.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.