1
$\begingroup$

The Faddeev-Popov gauge-fixed Yang-Mills Lagrangian is invariant under $$ \bar c\to\bar c+\chi $$ for any odd constant $\chi$. What is the physical interpretation of this invariance? What does this translation transformation correspond to, in practical terms (e.g., at the level of Feynman diagrams)?

Perhaps relevant: this invariance forbids terms quadratic in $\bar cc$, which are necessary for renormalisability if we pick e.g. a gauge-fixing condition of the form $\partial\cdot A+\alpha A^2\equiv 0$ rather than the standard $\partial\cdot A\equiv 0$ one.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Do you have any reason to believe this has a physical interpretation? The (anti-)ghosts are artificial degrees of freedom to begin with, so I would not expect any symmetries/conserved quantities that act purely in the ghost part of the phase space to have any meaning at all. $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Aug 8 '17 at 12:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $c\to \mathrm e^{i\theta}c,\bar c\to\mathrm e^{-i\theta}\bar c$ corresponds to ghost number conservation, which has a rather clear physical meaning (at least in terms of Feynman diagrams). $\bar c\to\bar c+\chi$ eludes me though. $\endgroup$ – AccidentalFourierTransform Aug 8 '17 at 12:33
  • $\begingroup$ I'd say that ghost number conservation is a necessary consequence of only quantities with zero ghost number being truly physical observables - meaning it is inherent in the BRST/ghost construction, since its non-conservation would make the condition of "zero ghost number" unstable. $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Aug 8 '17 at 12:36
  • $\begingroup$ The corresponding Noether current is just the canonical momenta field for the antighost: $J_{\mu}^{\;a} = D_{\mu} c^{a}$. Current conservation is thus just the Euler-Lagrange equation for the ghost field: $\partial^{\mu} D_{\mu} c = 0$. I don't see any far-reaching physical significance. The same happens for the massless Klein-Gordon field, btw. $\endgroup$ – Prof. Legolasov Aug 8 '17 at 23:30
  • $\begingroup$ It corresponds to an ambiguity in BRS transformation of anti-ghost field and corresponds to an auxiliary degree of freedom (non-dynamical) which arises after fixing one of the term in $\bar{\delta}c + {\delta} \bar{c}=0$ by hand, where \bar{\delta} corresponds to anti-BRS transformation. $\endgroup$ – ved Aug 9 '17 at 7:41
2
+25
$\begingroup$

Like any continuous symmetry, it represents a conservation law. The symmetry is manifest in the Lagrangian density term $-i\partial_\mu\bar{c}D^\mu c$, where $\bar{c}$ is cyclic. But if we add a total derivative to get $i\bar{c}\partial_\mu D^\mu c$, we see $\partial_\mu D^\mu c=0$ so $D^\mu c$ is a Noether current. If you prefer to work with physical fields, it's best to work in the Landau gauge so $A^\mu$ is conserved, since the above ghost-sector result is just the BRST-transform of $\partial_\mu A^\mu =-\xi B$, which for $\xi = 0$ is a conservation law.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ nice +1, two comments: 1) I guess $B$ is the Lautrup-Nakanishi field, right? 2) what does the conservation law $\partial_\mu D^\mu c=0$ imply at the level of Feynman diagrams? [all Noether currents have an immediate consequence: $\partial_\mu T^{\mu\nu}=0$ implies that the total momentum is conserved (so that the correlation functions depend on the relative positions $x_i-x_j$); $\partial_\mu j^\mu=0$ implies that charge is conserved (so that the correlation functions vanish unless we have the same number of fields and its hermitian conjugates); etc] $\endgroup$ – AccidentalFourierTransform Aug 10 '17 at 13:39
  • $\begingroup$ @AccidentalFourierTransform Yes, $B$ is the L-N field. $\endgroup$ – J.G. Aug 10 '17 at 14:14

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.