1
$\begingroup$

This question has been edited a little to clarify the confusion I have.

The matter-antimatter asymmetry of the Universe quantified by the baryon asymmetry as $$Y_B=\frac{n_B-n_{\bar{B}}}{s}=\frac{n_B}{s}$$ i.e., the difference in the number densities of baryons $n_B$ and antibaryons $n_{\bar{B}}$ normalized w.r.t the comoving entropy density $s$. Sometimes the baryon assymetry is also expressed by normalizin the baryon number density w.r.t the comoving photon density $n_\gamma$.

What is the significance of normalizing the baryon asymmetry w.r.t $s$? Does it have anything to do with the fact that $sa^3$ is conserved (where $a$ is the scale factor)?

Addendum Why is it that people don't quote simply $(n_B-n_{\bar{B}})$ i.e., the number density of baryons (more precisely, that of baryons minus antibaryons) as the baryon asymmetry? Why do we have to normalize it w.r.t either the photon density $n_\gamma$ or the entropy density $s$?

I understand that as the Universe expands, this number density dilutes. Does it mean that the normalized quantity $Y_B$ don't dilute? If yes, is this the reason for normalizing it?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

You have to normalize it to something because $n_B - n_\bar B$ is just the number of baryons in the universe. I more frequently see the baryon asymmetry normalized by the number of CMB photons (e.g. this PDG table.

The Particle Data Group's review of Big-Bang cosmology says on page 12

For photons [...] $$ d(sR^3)/dt = 0. $$ For radiation, this corresponds to the relationship between expansion and cooling, $T \propto R^{-1}$ in an adiabatically expanding universe. Note also that both $s$ and $n_\gamma$ scale as $T^3$.

I interpret this to mean that your entropy-scaled baryon asymmetry and my photon-scaled baryon asymmetry are simply proportional to one another, for just the reason that you guessed in your question.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It's the "Addendum" that captures my confusion better. @rob $\endgroup$ – SRS Sep 13 '17 at 9:04
  • $\begingroup$ @SRS A number density would change as the Universe expands, but a ratio of number densities should not. $\endgroup$ – rob Sep 13 '17 at 22:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.